Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rshade/finfocus. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rshade/finfocus/main/.agents/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rshade/finfocusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rshade/finfocus/speckit-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rshade/finfocus/speckit-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rshade/finfocus/speckit-checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rshade/finfocus/speckit-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rshade/finfocus/speckit-checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.04992 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01997 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00998 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00499 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to speckit-checklist — 34 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 385 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Checklist Purpose: "Unit Tests for English"
CRITICAL CONCEPT: Checklists are UNIT TESTS FOR REQUIREMENTS WRITING - they validate the quality, clarity, and completeness of requirements in a given domain.
NOT for verification/testing:
- ❌ NOT "Verify the button clicks correctly"
- ❌ NOT "Test error handling works"
- ❌ NOT "Confirm the API returns 200"
- ❌ NOT checking if code/implementation matches the spec
FOR requirements quality validation:
- ✅ "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined for all card types?" (completeness)
- ✅ "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" (clarity)
- ✅ "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" (consistency)
- ✅ "Are accessibility requirements defined for keyboard navigation?" (coverage)
- ✅ "Does the spec define what happens when logo image fails to load?" (edge cases)
Metaphor: If your spec is code written in English, the checklist is its unit test suite. You're testing whether the requirements are well-written, complete, unambiguous, and ready for implementation - NOT whether the implementation works.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Pre-Execution Checks
Check for extension hooks (before checklist generation):
- Check if
.specify/extensions.ymlexists in the project root. - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.before_checklistkey - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
- Filter out hooks where
enabledis explicitlyfalse. Treat hooks without anenabledfield as enabled by default. - For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
conditionexpressions:- If the hook has no
conditionfield, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable - If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- If the hook has no
- When constructing slash commands from hook command names, replace dots (
.) with hyphens (-). For example,speckit.git.commit→/speckit-git-commit. - For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optionalflag:- Optional hook (
optional: true):## Extension Hooks **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension} Command: `/{command}` Description: {description} Prompt: {prompt} To execute: `/{command}` - Mandatory hook (
optional: false):
After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal## Extension Hooks **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension} Executing: `/{command}` EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command} Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Execution Steps.{command}id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as/skill:speckit-...or$speckit-...). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
- Optional hook (
- If no hooks are registered or
.specify/extensions.ymldoes not exist, skip silently
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +11 lines 4b327b57096c
- 16d ago Changed · -10 lines 4eb7e030d040
- 1mo ago First seen · 384 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 96306b22f2c4
speckit-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository rshade/finfocus (10 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 4,992 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to speckit-checklist, differing in 34 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
playwright
Playwright E2E testing patterns. Trigger: When writing Playwright E2E tests (Page Object Model, selectors, MCP exploration workflow). For Prowler-specific UI conventions under ui/tests, also use prowler-test-ui.
prowler-test-sdk
Testing patterns for Prowler SDK (Python). Trigger: When writing tests for the Prowler SDK (checks/services/providers), including provider-specific mocking rules (moto for AWS only).
tdd
Test-Driven Development workflow for ALL Prowler components (UI, SDK, API). Trigger: ALWAYS when implementing features, fixing bugs, or refactoring - regardless of component. This is a MANDATORY workflow, not optional.
prowler-test-mcp
Testing patterns for the Prowler MCP Server: in-memory FastMCP clients, the ProwlerAPIClient singleton, JSON:API model builders and mocked httpx transports. Trigger: When writing tests under mcpserver/tests/ (tools, models, apiclient, auth, sub-servers).
prowler-test-ui
E2E testing patterns for Prowler UI (Playwright). Trigger: When writing Playwright E2E tests under ui/tests in the Prowler UI (Prowler-specific base page/helpers, tags, flows).
prowler-test-api
Testing patterns for Prowler API: JSON:API, Celery tasks, RLS isolation, RBAC. Trigger: When writing tests for api/ (JSON:API requests/assertions, cross-tenant isolation, RBAC, Celery tasks, viewsets/serializers).