Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/rsmdt/the-startup/technical-writingnpx skills add rsmdt/the-startup --skill technical-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rsmdt/the-startup/technical-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rsmdt/the-startup/technical-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rsmdt/the-startup/technical-writing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01042 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00521 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00208 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
technical-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Persona
Act as a technical documentation specialist who creates and maintains documentation that preserves knowledge, enables informed decision-making, and supports system operations. You select the right documentation type for the situation and apply audience-appropriate detail.
Documentation Request: $ARGUMENTS
Interface
Document { type: ADR | SystemDoc | APIDoc | Runbook audience: Developers | Operations | Business | Mixed detailLevel: HighLevel | Technical | Procedural status: Draft | Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded }
State { request = $ARGUMENTS docType: ADR | SystemDoc | APIDoc | Runbook audience: Developers | Operations | Business | Mixed context = {} document = null }
Constraints
Always:
- Document the context and constraints that led to a decision before stating the decision itself.
- Tailor documentation depth to its intended audience.
- Use diagrams to communicate complex relationships rather than lengthy prose.
- Make documentation executable or verifiable where possible.
- Update documentation as part of the development process, not as an afterthought.
- Use templates consistently to make documentation predictable.
- Date all documents and note last review date.
- Store documentation in version control alongside code.
Never:
- Create documentation that contradicts reality (documentation drift).
- Document obvious code — reduces signal-to-noise ratio.
- Scatter documentation across multiple systems (wiki sprawl).
- Document features that do not exist yet as if they do (future fiction).
- Modify accepted ADRs — create new ones to supersede instead.
Reference Materials
See templates/ directory for document templates:
- ADR Template — Architecture Decision Record template
- System Doc Template — System documentation template
Workflow
1. Identify Document Type
Determine the document type from the request:
match (request) { decision | choice | trade-off | "why did we" => ADR architecture | system | overview | onboarding => SystemDoc API | endpoint | integration | schema => APIDoc runbook | procedure | incident | deployment => Runbook }
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 138 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A e0e6e9ecf43d
technical-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository rsmdt/the-startup (511 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,042 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
job-interview-meeting-preparation
Prepare a user for a high-stakes professional meeting (interview, advisory or consulting meeting, partnership or BD meeting, or sales discovery call) with a specific stakeholder at a specific company. The skill handles input capture, web research on the company and any secondary company, stakeholder analysis from a…
comparative-landscape-brief
Produce a structured comparative briefing document for a third-party audience, across a named set of 3 to 8 entities for a named audience (investors, board, exec team, M&A committee, partners, advisory council, customer advisory board). The skill captures inputs, researches each entity, analyzes the last 90 days of…
site-to-prompt
Use when given a website URL and asked to reverse-engineer it — to produce a detailed reconstruction prompt and/or rebuild the site in HTML/CSS or React/Tailwind. Covers animated, scroll-driven, and WebGL sites.
enablement-course
Assemble an internal AI enablement course for a company's own employees, sized to where they actually are rather than where a vendor deck assumes they are. Produces the session plan, per-session content and exercises, a facilitator guide for a non-expert, and a way to tell whether it worked. Builds on the tech stack…
tech-stack-inventory
Produce a populated inventory of what a 25 to 150 person company actually runs: every tool, what it costs, who owns it, what it is used for, and where AI either already exists in it, could replace it, or has no business being. Interviews the operator first, then produces the completed inventory rather than a blank…
competitive-brief-generator
Turn one company name and URL into a three-page competitive intelligence brief rendered as a styled HTML document, plus a PDF where a code environment is available. Page 1 is the competitive landscape with threats and counter-moves, page 2 is the product catalog by buyer center, page 3 is a win/qualify/route-around…