Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rterakedis/leanwheel-skills --skill harvest-findingsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rterakedis/leanwheel-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/harvest-findings)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/harvest-findings"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/harvest-findings/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/harvest-findings"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/harvest-findings.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.03640 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.01456 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00728 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00364 |
Grade A, and why
harvest-findings scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 169 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A c9932673eb70
harvest-findings is a skill published in the GitHub repository rterakedis/leanwheel-skills (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 3,640 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
finding-reconciliation
Merge the independent A/B/C findings tables into one adjudicated ledger in 07-verification/documentation-verification-report.md — normalizing to the finding schema, deduplicating by location and claim, recording per-finding corroboration without downgrading single-pass findings, promoting cross-pass disagreement to…
scoring-and-release-gate
Score a documentation package against the ten-dimension weighted rubric in references/scorecard-rubric.md with a cited justification per dimension, then evaluate the nineteen conditions in references/release-gate-conditions.md and emit a binary release-ready, conditionally-ready, or not-ready verdict with…
vibe-workstream-orchestration
Runs a multi-phase project from an orchestrating main thread that plans, routes and verifies but does not build. Defines a few long-lived workstreams, each owning a file area end to end in its own worktree, and routes every follow-up to the owning agent instead of spawning a one-off. Covers base-SHA recording…
vibe-requirements-validator
Validates PRD, user stories, or feature requirements against SMART criteria. Use when reviewing requirements to catch vagueness before it causes expensive rework.
vibe-scope-guard
Detects and redirects scope creep during implementation — unrequested features, drive-by refactors, premature abstraction, and over-engineering. Use while implementing, especially when a change is growing beyond the original request.
vibe-iteration-review
Performs end-of-iteration review with quality grading, metrics, and trend analysis. Use at the end of each development iteration or sprint.