Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/rtk-ai/rtk/code-simplifiernpx skills add rtk-ai/rtk --skill code-simplifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtkWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01169 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00584 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00234 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 179 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RTK Code Simplifier
Review and simplify Rust code in RTK while respecting the project's constraints.
Constraints (never simplify away)
LazyLockregex — cannot be moved inside functions even if "simpler".context()on every?— verbose but mandatory- Fallback to raw command — never remove even if it looks like dead code
- Exit code propagation — never simplify to
Ok(()) #[cfg(test)] mod tests— never remove test modules
Simplification Patterns
1. Iterator chains over manual loops
// ❌ Verbose
let mut result = Vec::new();
for line in input.lines() {
let trimmed = line.trim();
if !trimmed.is_empty() && trimmed.starts_with("error") {
result.push(trimmed.to_string());
}
}
// ✅ Idiomatic
let result: Vec<String> = input.lines()
.map(|l| l.trim())
.filter(|l| !l.is_empty() && l.starts_with("error"))
.map(str::to_string)
.collect();
2. String building
// ❌ Verbose push loop
let mut out = String::new();
for (i, line) in lines.iter().enumerate() {
out.push_str(line);
if i < lines.len() - 1 {
out.push('\n');
}
}
// ✅ join
let out = lines.join("\n");
3. Option/Result chaining
// ❌ Nested match
let result = match maybe_value {
Some(v) => match transform(v) {
Ok(r) => r,
Err(_) => default,
},
None => default,
};
// ✅ Chained
let result = maybe_value
.and_then(|v| transform(v).ok())
.unwrap_or(default);
4. Struct destructuring
// ❌ Repeated field access
fn process(args: &MyArgs) -> String {
format!("{} {}", args.command, args.subcommand)
}
// ✅ Destructure
fn process(&MyArgs { ref command, ref subcommand, .. }: &MyArgs) -> String {
format!("{} {}", command, subcommand)
}
5. Early returns over nesting
// ❌ Deeply nested
fn filter(input: &str) -> Option<String> {
if !input.is_empty() {
if let Some(line) = input.lines().next() {
if line.starts_with("error") {
return Some(line.to_string());
}
}
}
None
}
// ✅ Early return
fn filter(input: &str) -> Option<String> {
if input.is_empty() { return None; }
let line = input.lines().next()?;
if !line.starts_with("error") { return None; }
Some(line.to_string())
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 179 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 1a089ec6334d
code-simplifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository rtk-ai/rtk (78,131 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,169 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-simplifier
Review RTK Rust code for idiomatic simplification. Detects over-engineering, unnecessary allocations, verbose patterns. Applies Rust idioms without changing behavior.
build-teaql-app
Build or change a TeaQL application in Java, Rust, Go, Swift, Python, C#/.NET, or TypeScript, including Kotlin/JVM applications that consume Java-generated libraries. Mandatory order: first draft and save a complete KSML model, then verify the client and evaluate that saved model, repair it through repeated evaluation…
orchestrator-lanes
Claude Code dev-orchestrator only. File-based multi-lane PM playbook (score, DAG, run-controller, L0/L1/L2, ship). Use when this session IS that agent, or user says info / справка / lane-stack:orchestrator-lanes info. SKIP: Grok, Codex, Kimi, Qwen, AGY, Cursor writer CLIs and any default coding agent — do not load, do…
source-command-methodology-advisor
Analyzes your codebase and asks 3 targeted questions to recommend the right AI-assisted development methodology stack.
info
Lane-stack work-process cheat sheet. Catalog of resume, onboard, architect a new app, design, docs. Use when user says info, справка, lane-stack:info, /lane-stack:info, что умеет стек, как запускать.
lane-memory
SMA-style project fact corpus under .agents/memory/. Opt-in via adoc stages.memory.enabled. Use when user says память, lane-memory, corpus, CORE, почему бот забыл, or an agent needs durable non-code facts. Not PROGRESS/LESSONS dumps.