review

review is a skill for Claude Code from rube-de/cc-skills. It costs 66 tokens per session (3,158 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A GitHub issue checker that compares one issue with the current codebase, related pull requests, and project dependencies. A GitHub issue is a tracked task, bug, or request in a repository.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to validate an issue, check its status, find related pull requests, and receive a recommended next step.
Why use it?
It helps determine whether an issue is still relevant, already implemented, blocked by dependencies, or ready for action.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Part of the pm plugin — 5 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to validate an issue, check its status, find related pull requests, and receive a recommended next step.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rube-de/cc-skills --skill review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rube-de/cc-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install pm, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,158 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.03158
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.01579
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00632
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00316

Measured 10d ago against content hash 516bd01991c4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/pm/skills/review/SKILL.md · 375 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 375 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review: Single-Issue Deep Validation

Deep-validate a single GitHub issue against the current codebase. Cross-reference file paths, detect already-implemented features, check for related PRs, verify dependencies, and deliver a structured verdict with recommended action.

Workflow

1. Auth Check → 2. Detect Repo → 3. Fetch Issue → 4. Parse Body
→ 5. Codebase Cross-Reference → 6. PR Check → 7. Dependency Check
→ 8. Verdict → 9. Present Report → 10. Interactive Action

Step 1: Verify GitHub Auth

gh auth status

On failure: Stop and tell the user to run gh auth login.

Step 2: Detect Repository

gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner

On failure: Ask the user for the target repository (owner/repo).

Step 3: Fetch Issue

Require an issue number from the user's arguments. If none provided, use AskUserQuestion to ask for one.

gh issue view ISSUE_NUMBER --json number,title,body,state,labels,assignees,milestone,createdAt,updatedAt,author,comments

Edge cases:

  • Issue doesn't exist → abort with a clear error
  • Issue already closed → warn but continue (informational analysis is still useful)

Step 4: Parse Issue Body

Classify the issue into one of two tiers based on body structure:

Tier 1: Structured (created by /pm)

Detect /pm sections by their headers: ## Context, ## Acceptance Criteria, ## Implementation Guide, ## Scope.

Extract:

  • File paths from ## Implementation Guide and ## Scope sections
  • Acceptance criteria — lines matching VERIFY: or checkbox patterns (- [ ] unchecked and - [x] checked). Include both so re-reviews after body edits still see previously checked-off criteria.
  • Function/component names — backtick-wrapped identifiers in implementation sections
  • DependenciesBlocked by: #N and Blocks: #N patterns
  • Epic referencePart of #N pattern
  • Scope### In Scope and ### Out of Scope subsections

Read the full file on GitHub · 375 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 375 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 516bd01991c4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a skill published in the GitHub repository rube-de/cc-skills (10 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 3,158 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

great_cto

Use when the CTO describes a feature, task, or project goal. Orchestrates the full SDLC pipeline automatically based on project type.

avelikiy/great_cto · 32 tokens

vertical-fintech-mobile

Domain-knowledge pack for money on a phone — wallets, payments, custody and signing, transaction lifecycle, KYC/AML gates, and offline reconciliation. The rules that separate a payments app from a CRUD app with a currency symbol: a balance is a claim about a server, an idempotency key must outlive the process that…

avelikiy/great_cto · 119 tokens

vertical-hr-recruiting

Domain-knowledge primer for the HR & recruiting vertical (ATS, onboarding, workforce scheduling, engagement). Applied by architect/pm during spec authoring so they aren't naive about hiring pipelines, the admitted offer→onboard data-carry gap, EEO/I-9 compliance, and shift-coverage rules. Stops the four products from…

avelikiy/great_cto · 90 tokens

vertical-real-estate

Residential-proptech domain knowledge so architect / pm aren't naive when speccing real-estate products (listings, lead-crm, transaction-coordination, property-mgmt). Codifies MLS/IDX reality, listing status lifecycle + syndication canonical-source, long-cycle lead nurture, transaction-coordination as the high-pain…

avelikiy/great_cto · 99 tokens

vertical-retail

Retail & e-commerce domain knowledge for SMB storefront products (storefront, inventory, pricing, cart-recovery). Codifies the vocabulary (SKU vs variant, reorder point, COGS/margin, ATS, AOV), the non-obvious rules (Shopify owns the storefront — don't fight it head-on; the wedge is multichannel inventory + reorder…

avelikiy/great_cto · 156 tokens

opportunity-solution-tree

Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to customer opportunities, possible solutions, and experiments. Based on Teresa Torres' Continuous Discovery Habits. Use when the team is unclear what to build next, when multiple opportunities compete, or before writing a…

avelikiy/great_cto · 71 tokens