review-plan

review-plan is a skill for Claude Code from rube-de/cc-skills. It costs 66 tokens per session (2,111 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A plan-checking workflow that examines an implementation plan and compares it with the codebase before work begins.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to validate a written coding plan, gather outside reviews, combine overlapping feedback, and decide whether to execute or revise the plan.
Why use it?
It helps find missing steps, incorrect assumptions, and risky decisions before they turn into implementation problems.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions Codex.

Part of the council plugin — 3 skills, 7 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to validate a written coding plan, gather outside reviews, combine overlapping feedback, and decide whether to execute or revise the plan.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review-plan
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rube-de/cc-skills --skill review-plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rube-de/cc-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install council, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills, 7 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-plan

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review-plan/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review-plan)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-plan

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rube-de/cc-skills/review-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,111 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.02111
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.01056
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00422
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00211

Measured 11d ago against content hash 526a2792adeb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/council/skills/review-plan/SKILL.md · 237 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 237 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Plan — External Consultant Validation

External consultants + codebase verification catch plan flaws before execution begins.

Workflow

digraph review_plan {
  rankdir=TB;
  node [shape=box];

  locate [label="Step 1: Locate Plan"];
  verify [label="Step 2: Codebase Verification"];
  launch [label="Step 3: Launch Consultants\n(gemini + codex in parallel)"];
  synthesize [label="Step 4: Deduplicate & Synthesize"];
  present [label="Step 5: Present Structured Output"];
  decide [label="Step 6: User Decision"];

  locate -> verify -> launch -> synthesize -> present -> decide;

  decide -> execute [label="Ready to execute"];
  decide -> revise [label="Needs revision"];
  decide -> discuss [label="Needs discussion"];

  execute [label="Offer execution handoff" shape=ellipse];
  revise [label="List specific changes\nAsk: revise or proceed?" shape=ellipse];
  discuss [label="Present trade-offs\nfor user decision" shape=ellipse];
}

Step 1: Locate Plan

Check these sources in order — use the first match:

  • Explicit argument: If the user provided a file path, use it
  • Conversation context: If a plan was written or pasted earlier in this conversation, use that content
  • Plan directory discovery: From the repository root, search both plan directories and use the most recently modified .md file:
    ls -t .dev/cdt/plans/*.md docs/plans/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1
    
    Note: Run this from the repo root, not from the skill directory.

If no plan is found, ask the user with AskUserQuestion.

Read the full plan content before proceeding.

Step 2: Codebase Verification

Verify every concrete claim in the plan against the actual codebase. Check ALL of:

Claim Type Verification Method Failure =
File paths (modify/delete) Glob for existence Critical — plan references nonexistent files
File paths (create) Verify parent directory exists Note — files being created are expected to be absent
Line numbers Read the file, check lines match Warning — line numbers may have drifted
API signatures Grep for function/method names, verify params Critical — API has changed
Import paths (relative only) Glob for referenced module path, then Read to confirm expected export — skip package imports (react, lodash) and alias imports (@/lib/db) Critical — module doesn't exist or export is missing
Duplicate work Grep for existing implementations Warning — feature may already exist
Test files Glob for existing test files in same area Note — tests may already cover this

Read the full file on GitHub · 237 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 237 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 526a2792adeb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository rube-de/cc-skills (10 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 2,111 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

great_cto

Use when the CTO describes a feature, task, or project goal. Orchestrates the full SDLC pipeline automatically based on project type.

avelikiy/great_cto · 32 tokens

vertical-hr-recruiting

Domain-knowledge primer for the HR & recruiting vertical (ATS, onboarding, workforce scheduling, engagement). Applied by architect/pm during spec authoring so they aren't naive about hiring pipelines, the admitted offer→onboard data-carry gap, EEO/I-9 compliance, and shift-coverage rules. Stops the four products from…

avelikiy/great_cto · 90 tokens

vertical-real-estate

Residential-proptech domain knowledge so architect / pm aren't naive when speccing real-estate products (listings, lead-crm, transaction-coordination, property-mgmt). Codifies MLS/IDX reality, listing status lifecycle + syndication canonical-source, long-cycle lead nurture, transaction-coordination as the high-pain…

avelikiy/great_cto · 99 tokens

opportunity-solution-tree

Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to customer opportunities, possible solutions, and experiments. Based on Teresa Torres' Continuous Discovery Habits. Use when the team is unclear what to build next, when multiple opportunities compete, or before writing a…

avelikiy/great_cto · 71 tokens

skeptical-triage

Reusable 3-round self-challenge + arbiter pattern for filtering false positives from findings/verdicts. Use when the cost of a false-positive gate block exceeds the cost of 4 extra LLM turns.

avelikiy/great_cto · 49 tokens

vertical-fintech-mobile

Domain-knowledge pack for money on a phone — wallets, payments, custody and signing, transaction lifecycle, KYC/AML gates, and offline reconciliation. The rules that separate a payments app from a CRUD app with a currency symbol: a balance is a claim about a server, an idempotency key must outlive the process that…

avelikiy/great_cto · 119 tokens