Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ruchernchong/claude-kit/folder-orgnpx skills add ruchernchong/claude-kit --skill folder-orggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruchernchong/claude-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruchernchong/claude-kit/folder-org)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ruchernchong/claude-kit/folder-org"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ruchernchong/claude-kit/folder-org.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00511 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00255 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
folder-org scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Folder Structure
Core Principle: Colocation
Place code as close to where it's relevant as possible. Things that change together should be located together.
Organization Approaches
Feature-Based (Recommended for Frontend)
Group by domain - all related code in one place:
src/features/
├── auth/
│ ├── components/
│ ├── hooks/
│ ├── auth.service.ts
│ └── auth.test.ts
├── users/
└── products/
Layer-Based (Common for Backend)
Group by technical layer:
src/
├── controllers/
├── services/
├── models/
├── routes/
└── middleware/
Monorepo
apps/ # Applications
├── web/
├── api/
packages/ # Shared libraries (by domain, not language)
├── types/
├── utils/
└── ui/
Where to Put Things
| Type | Location |
|---|---|
| Shared types | types/ or packages/types/ |
| Utilities | lib/ or utils/ (split by domain) |
| Config | config/ or root |
| Unit tests | Colocate: foo.test.ts next to foo.ts |
| E2E tests | e2e/ or tests/e2e/ |
| Mocks/fixtures | __mocks__/ or test/mocks/ |
Naming Conventions
| Type | Convention |
|---|---|
| Files | kebab-case.ts |
| Unit tests | *.test.ts |
| E2E tests | *.e2e.ts |
| Schemas | *.schema.ts |
Anti-Patterns
- Catch-all files: Avoid
utils.ts,helpers.ts- split by domain - Deep nesting: Keep < 4 levels, use descriptive names instead
- Separated unit tests: Don't put all in
__tests__/- colocate instead - Language grouping: In monorepos, group by domain not language
- Bloated barrels: Avoid
index.tswith 50+ re-exports
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 81 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 66398ae0fa40
folder-org is a skill published in the GitHub repository ruchernchong/claude-kit (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 511 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…