superagent: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/defense-in-depth-validation/SKILL.md

Defense-in-Depth Validation is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from RudyCity/superagent. It costs 17 tokens per session (875 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of Defense-in-Depth Validation, MIT.

A method for checking data at every stage of a program, from incoming requests through business logic and the running environment.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when fixing data-related bugs or adding checks to APIs, application logic, environment-specific code, and debugging output.
Why use it?
It reduces bugs caused by invalid data slipping past one check and failing later in a different part of the code.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code: when-to-use in frontmatter. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is RudyCity/superagent's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on superagent itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything superagent configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to RudyCity/superagent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RudyCity/superagent/main/.agents/skills/defense-in-depth-validation/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RudyCity/superagent

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Defense-in-Depth Validation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rudycity/superagent/defense-in-depth-validation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rudycity/superagent/defense-in-depth-validation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rudycity/superagent/defense-in-depth-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rudycity/superagent/defense-in-depth-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for Defense-in-Depth Validation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rudycity/superagent/defense-in-depth-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rudycity/superagent/defense-in-depth-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 17 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 875 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00017 $0.00875
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00438
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00175
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00088

Measured 11d ago against content hash 26b67533bbd6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Defense-in-Depth Validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to Defense-in-Depth Validation — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/defense-in-depth-validation/SKILL.md · 131 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Defense-in-Depth Validation

Overview

When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.

Core principle: Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.

Why Multiple Layers

Single validation: "We fixed the bug" Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"

Different layers catch different cases:

  • Entry validation catches most bugs
  • Business logic catches edge cases
  • Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers
  • Debug logging helps when other layers fail

The Four Layers

Layer 1: Entry Point Validation

Purpose: Reject obviously invalid input at API boundary

function createProject(name: string, workingDirectory: string) {
  if (!workingDirectory || workingDirectory.trim() === '') {
    throw new Error('workingDirectory cannot be empty');
  }
  if (!existsSync(workingDirectory)) {
    throw new Error(`workingDirectory does not exist: ${workingDirectory}`);
  }
  if (!statSync(workingDirectory).isDirectory()) {
    throw new Error(`workingDirectory is not a directory: ${workingDirectory}`);
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Layer 2: Business Logic Validation

Purpose: Ensure data makes sense for this operation

function initializeWorkspace(projectDir: string, sessionId: string) {
  if (!projectDir) {
    throw new Error('projectDir required for workspace initialization');
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Layer 3: Environment Guards

Purpose: Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts

async function gitInit(directory: string) {
  // In tests, refuse git init outside temp directories
  if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test') {
    const normalized = normalize(resolve(directory));
    const tmpDir = normalize(resolve(tmpdir()));

    if (!normalized.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
      throw new Error(
        `Refusing git init outside temp dir during tests: ${directory}`
      );
    }
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 131 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 131 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 26b67533bbd6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Defense-in-Depth Validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository RudyCity/superagent (21 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 875 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to Defense-in-Depth Validation, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 16 tokens

langsmith-observability

LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 45 tokens

experimental-code-coverage-local-debugger

Runs code coverage locally via Universal Test Runner (UTR) or helper scripts, mimicking LUCI trybots. Activate when CQ tryjobs fail or underreport coverage, to test local GN/recipe repairs before uploading, or to debug hermetic crashes.

chromium/chromium · 59 tokens

adversarial-reviewer

Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.

emdash-cms/emdash · 71 tokens

cli-e2e

Write, modify, or debug Docker-based Composio CLI end-to-end tests under ts/e2e-tests/cli, including binary invocation, fixture isolation, output assertions, and package manifests. Use for CLI E2E test suites only; use cli-command for CLI source implementation.

ComposioHQ/composio · 62 tokens

work

Deliver one maintainer-approved EmDash issue, choosing the bug-fix path for a defect and the direct implementation path for an enhancement or task.

emdash-cms/emdash · 31 tokens