Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RudyCity/superagentnpx agentmods add skills/rudycity/superagent/protect-mcp-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rudycity/superagent/protect-mcp-setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rudycity/superagent/protect-mcp-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rudycity/superagent/protect-mcp-setup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rudycity/superagent/protect-mcp-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rudycity/superagent/protect-mcp-setup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.01678 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00839 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00336 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00168 |
Grade B, and why
protect-mcp-setup scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletemediumDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
context.command_pattern == "rm -rf" Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 208 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
protect-mcp — Policy Enforcement + Signed Receipts
Cryptographic governance for every Claude Code tool call. Each invocation is evaluated against a Cedar policy and produces an Ed25519-signed receipt that anyone can verify offline.
Overview
Claude Code runs powerful tools: Bash, Edit, Write, WebFetch. By default
there is no audit trail, no policy enforcement, and no way to prove what was
decided after the fact. protect-mcp closes all three gaps:
- Cedar policies (AWS's open authorization engine) evaluate every tool call before execution. Cedar deny is authoritative.
- Ed25519 receipts record each decision with its inputs, the policy that governed it, and the outcome. Receipts are hash-chained.
- Offline verification via
npx @veritasacta/verify. No server, no account, no trust in the operator.
Problem
AI agents make decisions that affect money, safety, and rights. The Claude Code session log records what happened, but the log is:
- Mutable — anyone with access can edit it
- Unsigned — there is no way to prove integrity
- Operator-bound — verification requires trusting whoever holds the log
For compliance contexts (finance, healthcare, regulated research), this is not sufficient. You need tamper-evident evidence that can be verified by third parties without trusting you.
Solution
Add protect-mcp to your Claude Code project:
# 1. Install the plugin (adds hooks + skill to your project)
claude plugin install wshobson/agents/protect-mcp
# 2. Configure hooks in .claude/settings.json (see below)
# 3. Start the receipt-signing server (runs locally, no external calls)
npx protect-mcp@latest serve --enforce
# 4. Use Claude Code normally. Every tool call is now policy-evaluated
# and produces a signed receipt in ./receipts/
Hook Configuration
Add the following to your project's .claude/settings.json:
{
"hooks": {
"PreToolUse": [
{
"matcher": ".*",
"hook": {
"type": "command",
"command": "npx protect-mcp@latest evaluate --policy ./protect.cedar --tool \"$TOOL_NAME\" --input \"$TOOL_INPUT\" || exit 2"
}
}
],
"PostToolUse": [
{
"matcher": ".*",
"hook": {
"type": "command",
"command": "npx protect-mcp@latest sign --tool \"$TOOL_NAME\" --input \"$TOOL_INPUT\" --output \"$TOOL_OUTPUT\" --receipts ./receipts/"
}
}
]
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 208 lines · 48 tokens per session scan B 3a15eb2b5197
protect-mcp-setup is a skill published in the GitHub repository RudyCity/superagent (21 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,678 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…