Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RudyCity/superagentnpx agentmods add skills/rudycity/superagent/signed-audit-trails-recipeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rudycity/superagent/signed-audit-trails-recipe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rudycity/superagent/signed-audit-trails-recipe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rudycity/superagent/signed-audit-trails-recipe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rudycity/superagent/signed-audit-trails-recipe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rudycity/superagent/signed-audit-trails-recipe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.03034 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00607 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00303 |
Grade B, and why
signed-audit-trails-recipe scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletemediumDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
context.command_pattern in ["rm -rf", "dd", "mkfs", "shred"] Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 346 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Signed Audit Trails for Claude Code Tool Calls
Cookbook-style walkthrough for cryptographically signed receipts on every
Claude Code tool call. This is the teaching skill. For the runtime
implementation, install the protect-mcp plugin.
What this gives you
Every tool call (Bash, Edit, Write, WebFetch) is:
- Evaluated against a Cedar policy before execution. If the policy denies the call, the tool does not run.
- Signed as an Ed25519 receipt after execution. Receipts are JCS-canonical, hash-chained, and verifiable offline by anyone with the public key.
An auditor, regulator, or counterparty can verify the full chain later with a
single CLI command (npx @veritasacta/verify receipts/*.json). No network
call, no vendor lookup, no trust in the operator.
When to use the pattern
- Regulated environments (finance, healthcare, critical infrastructure) where you need tamper-evident evidence of agent behavior
- CI/CD pipelines where you want to prove that a policy gate held for every automated build step
- Multi-party collaboration where a counterparty wants to verify your agent's behavior without trusting your operator
- Compliance contexts (EU AI Act Article 12, SLSA provenance for agent-built software) where standard logging is not sufficient
Step 1: Install the hook configuration
Create .claude/settings.json in your project root:
{
"hooks": {
"PreToolUse": [
{
"matcher": ".*",
"hook": {
"type": "command",
"command": "npx protect-mcp@latest evaluate --policy ./protect.cedar --tool \"$TOOL_NAME\" --input \"$TOOL_INPUT\" --fail-on-missing-policy false"
}
}
],
"PostToolUse": [
{
"matcher": ".*",
"hook": {
"type": "command",
"command": "npx protect-mcp@latest sign --tool \"$TOOL_NAME\" --input \"$TOOL_INPUT\" --output \"$TOOL_OUTPUT\" --receipts ./receipts/ --key ./protect-mcp.key"
}
}
]
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 346 lines · 72 tokens per session scan B bf65a3d58a48
signed-audit-trails-recipe is a skill published in the GitHub repository RudyCity/superagent (21 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 3,034 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…