skillshare is a command-line tool that keeps AI coding-agent skills, agents, rules, commands, prompts, and other file-based resources synchronized from one source across many AI CLI tools. Individuals and teams use it to share and manage these resources across projects and organizations. The catalogue entries are skillshare commands and skills.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/runkids/skillsharenpx agentmods add skills/runkids/skillshare/skillshare-implement-featureWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/runkids/skillshare/skillshare-implement-feature)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runkids/skillshare/skillshare-implement-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runkids/skillshare/skillshare-implement-feature/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runkids/skillshare/skillshare-implement-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runkids/skillshare/skillshare-implement-feature.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.01969 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00788 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00394 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
skillshare-implement-feature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 252 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement a feature following TDD workflow. $ARGUMENTS is a spec file path (e.g., specs/my-feature.md) or a plain-text feature description.
Scope: This skill writes Go code and tests. It does NOT update website docs (use update-docs after) or CHANGELOG (use changelog after).
Before acting, run python3 scripts/ai-context.py cli-development testing. Those topics are the source of truth for repository patterns, execution boundaries and verification; this skill retains the TDD orchestration.
Workflow
Step 1: Understand Requirements
If $ARGUMENTS is a file path:
- Read the spec file
- Extract acceptance criteria and edge cases
- Identify affected packages
If $ARGUMENTS is a description:
- Search existing code for related functionality
- Identify the right package to extend
- Ask the user only if ambiguity would materially change scope or public interfaces
Step 2: Identify Affected Files
List all files that will be created or modified:
# Typical pattern for a new command
cmd/skillshare/<command>.go # Command handler
cmd/skillshare/<command>_project.go # Project-mode handler (if dual-mode)
internal/<package>/<feature>.go # Core logic
tests/integration/<command>_test.go # Integration test
Display the file list and continue.
Step 3: Write Failing Tests First (RED)
Write integration tests using testutil.Sandbox:
func TestFeature_BasicCase(t *testing.T) {
sb := testutil.NewSandbox(t)
defer sb.Cleanup()
// Setup
sb.CreateSkill("test-skill", map[string]string{
"SKILL.md": "---\nname: test-skill\n---\n# Content",
})
// Act
result := sb.RunCLI("command", "args...")
// Assert
result.AssertSuccess(t)
result.AssertOutputContains(t, "expected output")
}
Verify tests fail (inside the devcontainer, see the skillshare-devcontainer skill):
docker exec "$CONTAINER" bash -c 'cd /workspace && go test ./tests/integration -run TestFeature_BasicCase -count=1'
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed · -6 lines fcd0b1e6743c
- 28d ago Changed 6b381e6b40f6
- 1mo ago First seen · 258 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 0f3861be3481
skillshare-implement-feature is a skill published in the GitHub repository runkids/skillshare (2,795 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 1,969 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
repro-first
Bug-fix mode that reproduces a bug in a failing test before changing any code. Entered with /repro-first.
cf-tdd
Gate before writing production code — direct implementation by default, TDD (RED→GREEN→REFACTOR) with --add-tests or config tdd: true. TRIGGER — any new feature, implementation, or refactor: "implement this", "build this feature", "create a function", "add a new endpoint", "write the implementation", "refactor this"…
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality. Use when asked to add tests to a function, fix a bug…
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.
test-driven-development
Test-driven development, or TDD, is a way to build software by writing a test that fails, adding the smallest code that makes it pass, and then cleaning up the code. These instructions require that process for features, bug fixes, refactors, and behavior changes.
user-story-writer
Escribir historias de usuario bien estructuradas con criterios de aceptación y casos extremos. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir historias de usuario, crear tickets a partir de un resumen de características, convertir un PRD en historias o redactar criterios de aceptación. Produce historias listas para estimar en formato…