Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add runverdict/sf-security-review-toolkit/plugin install sf-security-review-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/runverdict/sf-security-review-toolkit/security-review-journey)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runverdict/sf-security-review-toolkit/security-review-journey"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runverdict/sf-security-review-toolkit/security-review-journey/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runverdict/sf-security-review-toolkit/security-review-journey"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runverdict/sf-security-review-toolkit/security-review-journey.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00183 | $0.17219 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00092 | $0.08610 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.03444 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01722 |
Grade A, and why
security-review-journey scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
outer tool call, so its pip/curl/git/npm subprocesses run unprompted under it), How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 930 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Review Journey
The autonomous driver for the AppExchange/AgentExchange security-review
submission. One trigger phrase runs a seconds-long preflight, surfaces a single
3-tier report, then drives every phase to a finished, downloadable submission
package — pausing only when an input would actually degrade the audit, or when
an action reaches outside read-only-local: touching something live (a
read-only probe, a scratch org) OR mutating the host / egressing to the network
(installing a scanner, fetching third-party rule packs). Those all need
explicit consent — silence-is-yes / full-auto authorizes ONLY the inputs the
preflight already DETECTED (elements, endpoints, package facts, resume state),
never an install, a network fetch, a live op, the consent gates, or the
audit-phase stops (the tier go-ahead and the show-the-target-map step) — every
one of those is asked via AskUserQuestion and recorded. It
never says "will pass": the strongest verdict it can reach is "first-attempt-
ready / no known blockers in what we can verify — Salesforce pen-tests
regardless." It is read-only on the partner's source, and never installs
software or fetches remote content without a yes (see run-scans' hard
boundary; an absent scanner is PENDING-OWNER-RUN, not an auto-install).
This is a deliberate change from the 0.1 router: that version only detected state and handed off. This one drives. It still answers "just this step" and "where are we?" as a router when that's all you asked — but the default for a run-shaped request is to run.
When to use
- Run it all: "run the security review", "prep my app for the Salesforce review", "get me ready to submit to AppExchange / AgentExchange". → full autonomous run.
- Readiness question: "am I ready for AppExchange/AgentExchange?" → preflight
- run (the honest answer requires the audit, not just a checklist glance).
- Resume: "continue the review", "pick up where we left off" → preflight detects the furthest-complete phase and resumes from there.
- Status only: "where are we on the review?", "what's left?" → router mode: report state and the single next action, run nothing.
- One step: "just run the audit", "regenerate the artifacts" → router mode: hand to that one skill and stop.
- NOT a general application security review. This skill is scoped to the Salesforce ISV security-review submission — its findings, artifacts, and verdict are shaped to that review's eight categories and five-step wizard. A bare "is my app secure?" with no AppExchange/AgentExchange intent is out of scope; say so and offer the scoped run rather than hijacking the request.
- NOT a substitute for Salesforce's own penetration test, and NOT a certifier — it prepares evidence and gets you close, for free, before the fee.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 930 lines · 183 tokens per session scan A dbfb73c306ef
security-review-journey is a skill published in the GitHub repository runverdict/sf-security-review-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 183 tokens to every session and 17,219 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
explicit-checker
Scans lyrics for explicit content and verifies that explicit flags match actual content. Use before Suno generation or release to ensure accurate content ratings.
plagiarism-checker
Scans lyrics for phrases that may match existing songs using web search and LLM knowledge. Use before release to check for unintentional borrowing.
compliance-analysis
Guides Slice MCP compliance analysis using compliance ticket breakdowns and object-level compliance tickets, plus related stakeholder, securities, equity plan, equity pool, valuation, tax-treatment, and cap-table tools. Use when answering questions about company compliance posture, compliance tickets, missing data…
equity-compensation-analysis
Guides Slice MCP analysis of equity compensation, grants, options, RSUs, vesting, exercises, forfeitures, PTEP, tax treatments, and valuations. Use when answering questions about employee equity, grant positions, vested or exercisable quantities, exercise price, FMV/409A, option pool consumption, tax treatment, or…
negotiation
Danish consumer rights, negotiation tactics, email templates, and pricing benchmarks for subscription price negotiation. Reference this when drafting negotiation emails or advising on subscription costs.
validate-album
Validates album directory structure, file locations, and content integrity. Use before release or whenever the user wants to check an album's structural health.