Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add runxhq/runx --skill redact-piigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/runxhq/runxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/redact-pii)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/redact-pii"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runxhq/runx/redact-pii/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/redact-pii"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runxhq/runx/redact-pii.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00644 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00322 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
redact-pii scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Redact PII
Treat the verdict as a boundary gate. Only ready returns content that may cross the boundary. needs_review and blocked return no residual content.
Procedure
- Resolve
mode:redact,tokenize, orblock. Resolve target classes fromclasses; omitted classes use the broad default policy. - Inspect the supplied content and return PII detections as class, UTF-16 code-unit span, and confidence. Never copy a matched value into the report or reasoning.
- Use semantic judgment for names, addresses, quasi-identifiers, and whether removal destroys meaning. Choose
needs_reviewwhen confidence is insufficient. - The deterministic finalizer validates spans and policy, performs the replacements itself, scans the residual for direct and obfuscated high-confidence identifiers, computes source and residual digests, and strips residual content unless the final decision is
ready. - A
blockpolicy always returnsblocked. This skill never sends, exports, logs, or stores content.
The finalizer, not the agent, owns replacement text and digests. redact emits [REDACTED:CLASS]; tokenize emits stable per-document [TOKEN:CLASS:N] placeholders. Invalid or overlapping spans fail closed.
Output
redaction_report:
decision: ready | needs_review | blocked
detected:
- class: string
span: [integer, integer]
confidence: number
source_digest: sha256:...
redacted_digest: sha256:... | null
residual_risk:
level: low | medium | high
reason_code: string
reason: string
scanner:
status: pass | hold | block
findings:
- class: string
span: [integer, integer]
rule: string
policy:
classes: array
mode: redact | tokenize | block
locale: string
redacted_content: string
Scanner findings contain locations and rule names, never matched values. A clean scanner does not prove that semantic identifiers cannot exist; that uncertainty remains the reviewer agent's job and must produce needs_review when material.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- fixtures/ambiguous-name-needs-review.yaml 1.0 KB
- fixtures/direct-leakage-stops.yaml 1.2 KB
- fixtures/obfuscated-email-stops.yaml 1.1 KB
- fixtures/redact-pii-blocked.yaml 963 B
- fixtures/redact-pii-needs-content.yaml 799 B
- fixtures/redact-pii-ready.yaml 2.4 KB
- fixtures/tokenize-stable-placeholders.yaml 1.2 KB
- redact-pii.mjs 9.0 KB runs code
- X.yaml 3.2 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 59 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 2358e19a81b0
redact-pii is a skill published in the GitHub repository runxhq/runx (87 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 644 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
dd-report-format
Standard output format for due diligence analysis reports. Use when producing your final analysis to ensure consistency across all specialist agents.
dd-risk-scoring
Calculate weighted risk scores from specialist agent reports. Use when synthesizing multiple due diligence reports into an overall investment risk assessment.
dd-synthesis
Synthesize findings from multiple specialist agents into a coherent investment recommendation. Use when combining reports from 9+ specialist agents into a single decision document.
dd-sourcing
Document sources properly for due diligence reports. Use when citing any external data, ensuring full traceability and auditability of findings.
dd-verification
Verify claims in pitch decks and founder statements using multiple independent sources. Use when analyzing any claim about market size, traction, team background, or competitive positioning.
codew-release-qa-sweep
Use before claiming Codewhale release work is done: run the full gate sweep and list the manual QA targets.