Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add runxhq/runx --skill sign-receiptgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/runxhq/runxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/sign-receipt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/sign-receipt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runxhq/runx/sign-receipt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/sign-receipt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runxhq/runx/sign-receipt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00764 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00382 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
sign-receipt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sign Receipt
Record a bounded attestation about something that happened outside Runx so a later governed run can cite exactly what was claimed, by whom, on which evidence, and for what reliance scope. The native Runx receipt signature proves the attestation packet was sealed without later modification. It does not prove the external action itself happened.
That distinction makes this skill useful without turning a signature into a fictional provider verifier. The actual proof remains in the referenced commit, provider object, approval record, transaction, or other evidence system.
When to use it
Use sign-receipt when an operator performed a legitimate off-runtime action
and downstream automation needs a stable, auditable assertion about it. Examples
include a manual console change, an externally approved decision, or a provider
operation completed before a native adapter existed.
Do not use it to launder an unsupported claim, copy raw evidence into a receipt, or replace a provider readback surface that Runx can actually call. If the external record is available through a governed reader, prefer that stronger evidence path.
How it works
- Supply the action, named principal, exact claim, optional reliance scope, and bounded opaque evidence references.
- Each evidence item names only a stable ref, SHA-256 digest, and what that evidence is asserted to prove. Raw messages, receipts, secrets, and personal records are not accepted.
- Native
receipt.attestvalidates completeness, rejects duplicates and secret-shaped material, and computes a deterministic attestation digest. - The normal Runx receipt signer seals that packet into the parent run.
- Later consumers can verify the receipt and decide whether its declared reliance scope is sufficient for their own action.
The skill never calls the provider named in the claim and never appends to an external ledger. Its signature mode and proof boundary are explicit in the result.
Inputs and result
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 80 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 512935aa95e2
sign-receipt is a skill published in the GitHub repository runxhq/runx (84 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 764 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
dd-synthesis
Synthesize findings from multiple specialist agents into a coherent investment recommendation. Use when combining reports from 9+ specialist agents into a single decision document.
dd-report-format
Standard output format for due diligence analysis reports. Use when producing your final analysis to ensure consistency across all specialist agents.
dd-risk-scoring
Calculate weighted risk scores from specialist agent reports. Use when synthesizing multiple due diligence reports into an overall investment risk assessment.
dd-sourcing
Document sources properly for due diligence reports. Use when citing any external data, ensuring full traceability and auditability of findings.
dd-verification
Verify claims in pitch decks and founder statements using multiple independent sources. Use when analyzing any claim about market size, traction, team background, or competitive positioning.
compliance-audit
Static compliance audit with regulatory profiles. v1.14 ships GDPR profile (data subject rights, lawful basis, security measures, accountability). SOC 2 and HIPAA profiles scaffolded as future-markers in PROFILES.md - enable in v1.15+. Stack-agnostic.