Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add runxhq/runx --skill vuln-disclosuregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/runxhq/runxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/vuln-disclosure)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/vuln-disclosure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runxhq/runx/vuln-disclosure/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/vuln-disclosure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runxhq/runx/vuln-disclosure.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00933 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00466 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
vuln-disclosure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vulnerability Disclosure
Publish a reviewed security advisory through a configured provider without
pretending an attempted publication succeeded. The default prepares the exact
payload, gates the live publication, and requires independent readback;
vuln-disclosure remains the explicit preparation runner and publish accepts
its typed packet in composed use. Where cve-audit proves
exact vulnerability identities and vuln-triage decides exposure,
remediation, and wording, this skill checks whether one exact advisory is ready
to enter a consequential provider lane.
Disclosure deserves a distinct boundary because a technically correct finding can still be premature, unsafe, mistargeted, or unhelpful to affected users. Embargo, remediation availability, channel, audience, and disclosure authority must all be visible before publication approval is requested.
How it works
- Admit one validated
vuln-triageadvisory packet and preserve its evidence binding and exact advisory ids. - Review the specified channel, target, embargo posture, remediation context, and disclosure checklist.
- Decide
holdorready_for_publication_approval. The review may not add or omit affected advisory ids or silently rewrite the payload. - Deterministically package a digest-bound outbox packet for the named target.
- The default runner stops with
publication_status: not_publishedandprovider_status: not_called. publishrecomputes the payload digest, requests approval for that exact packet, invokesadvisory.publishunder one idempotency key, and then callsadvisory.read. The returned advisory ref and payload digest must match.
Safe review and packaging need no human approval because they remain local. The native provider lane owns the human gate, idempotency, configured binding, publication request, and stable readback. No provider token or HTTP client lives in this package. Until the independent read succeeds, no receipt may describe the advisory as live.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 94 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A af6c7ff61d85
vuln-disclosure is a skill published in the GitHub repository runxhq/runx (84 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 933 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
dd-risk-scoring
Calculate weighted risk scores from specialist agent reports. Use when synthesizing multiple due diligence reports into an overall investment risk assessment.
dd-synthesis
Synthesize findings from multiple specialist agents into a coherent investment recommendation. Use when combining reports from 9+ specialist agents into a single decision document.
dd-report-format
Standard output format for due diligence analysis reports. Use when producing your final analysis to ensure consistency across all specialist agents.
dd-sourcing
Document sources properly for due diligence reports. Use when citing any external data, ensuring full traceability and auditability of findings.
dd-verification
Verify claims in pitch decks and founder statements using multiple independent sources. Use when analyzing any claim about market size, traction, team background, or competitive positioning.
compliance-audit
Static compliance audit with regulatory profiles. v1.14 ships GDPR profile (data subject rights, lawful basis, security measures, accountability). SOC 2 and HIPAA profiles scaffolded as future-markers in PROFILES.md - enable in v1.15+. Stack-agnostic.