Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add runxhq/runx --skill vuln-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/runxhq/runxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/vuln-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/vuln-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runxhq/runx/vuln-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/vuln-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runxhq/runx/vuln-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00863 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00432 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
vuln-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vulnerability Triage
Translate verified vulnerability identities into an operator decision: what is affected, what exposure is established or unknown, how urgent the response is, what remediation is justified, and whether an advisory should be prepared. This is the judgment layer of the security chain, not another scanner.
Use cve-audit first to prove the exact dependency versions and OSV advisory
identities. vuln-triage then reasons about operational exposure and priority
without changing those facts. An advisory draft can later move to
vuln-disclosure, which owns the publication boundary.
Runners
scan accepts the exact CVE audit result, its independent verification packet,
and the sealed receipt reference. Every assessment remains bound to dependency,
installed version, and advisory id. Judgment may classify priority, distinguish
established from unknown exposure, and propose remediation, but confidence must
describe only that judgment—the CVE identity is already verified.
advisory accepts only a validated triage packet. It prepares precise wording
for the admitted advisory ids and returns a review packet with
publication_status: not_published. It does not call a repository, advisory,
email, or social provider.
Operating standard
- Keep verified identity, exposure judgment, and remediation confidence separate.
- State affected versions, preconditions, impact, and mitigations precisely.
- Treat unknown exposure as a reason to investigate or escalate, not as proof of exploitation or safety.
- Avoid alarmism and vague severity labels. Explain the operational reason for priority and the evidence still missing.
- Preserve every verified finding. Adding a new CVE or silently omitting one invalidates the packet.
The finalized triage packet adds deterministic escalation criteria for high
priority, unknown exposure, and low-confidence judgments. A clean audit returns
no_verified_findings; it does not certify the target secure.
Inputs and result
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 95 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 1100857cf7c0
vuln-triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository runxhq/runx (87 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 863 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
dd-report-format
Standard output format for due diligence analysis reports. Use when producing your final analysis to ensure consistency across all specialist agents.
dd-risk-scoring
Calculate weighted risk scores from specialist agent reports. Use when synthesizing multiple due diligence reports into an overall investment risk assessment.
dd-synthesis
Synthesize findings from multiple specialist agents into a coherent investment recommendation. Use when combining reports from 9+ specialist agents into a single decision document.
dd-sourcing
Document sources properly for due diligence reports. Use when citing any external data, ensuring full traceability and auditability of findings.
dd-verification
Verify claims in pitch decks and founder statements using multiple independent sources. Use when analyzing any claim about market size, traction, team background, or competitive positioning.
codew-release-qa-sweep
Use before claiming Codewhale release work is done: run the full gate sweep and list the manual QA targets.