Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add runxhq/runx --skill work-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/runxhq/runxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/work-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/work-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runxhq/runx/work-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/runxhq/runx/work-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/runxhq/runx/work-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00719 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00360 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
work-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Work Plan
Turn one objective into a plan that downstream runners can consume without reinterpreting the source request.
Procedure
- Start from
objective. Whenchange_setis supplied byissue-intake, preserve it exactly; do not rewrite its target surfaces, invariants, success criteria, or commencement decision. - Classify the plan as
workspace_changeorskill_package. Skill-package authoring belongs toskill-lab; do not route it through a generic repo-change step. - Split work at authority, mutation, dependency, and review boundaries. Keep steps coarse enough to produce a meaningful artifact.
- Declare ordered phases and repo change requests. Parallel work must have no dependency or shared mutation target.
- Declare orchestration steps with exact skill references, scopes, mutation flags, inputs, and prior-step context references.
- Return
blockedwhen a question must be answered before mutation. Never turn uncertainty into an executable plan. - Native catalog inspection supplies the actual installed skill set. The
domain validator then verifies source preservation, ordered DAGs, mutation
declarations, context references, catalog ownership, and the
skill-labboundary. Invalid candidates are withheld and returned as a blocked packet.
This skill does not approve or execute mutations. A mutating: true field describes authority a future step will need.
Output
decision: ready | blocked
plan_kind: workspace_change | skill_package
change_set: object
objective_summary: string
workspace_change_plan: object
orchestration_steps: array
required_skills: array
open_questions: array
evidence: object
validation:
status: pass | hold
findings: array
workspace_change_plan contains plan_id, change_set_id, objective_summary, shared invariants, success criteria, ordered phases, integration checks, and open questions. Each phase contains ordered repo change requests with dependencies, validation commands, and mutation declarations.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 62 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A fbd52df58519
work-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository runxhq/runx (87 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 719 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
gh-file-issue
Use when filing a new Codewhale GitHub issue: turn a bug or idea into a well-formed, actionable issue with repro, acceptance criteria, labels, and milestone.
gh-treasure-hunt
Hunt the issue/PR queue for highest value-over-risk wins: clean focused community PRs, already-implemented issues to close, safe quick-fixes.
gh-assign-issues
Use to assign GitHub issues to a milestone and/or owners in bulk, verifying each.
dd-report-format
Standard output format for due diligence analysis reports. Use when producing your final analysis to ensure consistency across all specialist agents.
dd-risk-scoring
Calculate weighted risk scores from specialist agent reports. Use when synthesizing multiple due diligence reports into an overall investment risk assessment.
dd-synthesis
Synthesize findings from multiple specialist agents into a coherent investment recommendation. Use when combining reports from 9+ specialist agents into a single decision document.