Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/rust-works/succinctly/testingnpx skills add rust-works/succinctly --skill testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rust-works/succinctlyWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00049 | $0.02132 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01066 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00426 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00213 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 246 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Skill
Guidelines for writing effective tests that actually verify correctness.
Critical Anti-Pattern: Success-Only Tests
Never write tests that only check for successful execution without verifying output.
Bad Example (YAML test suite bug)
// BAD: Only checks parse success, not correctness
#[test]
fn test_sequence_of_mappings() {
let yaml = b"- name: Alice\n age: 30";
let result = YamlIndex::build(yaml);
assert!(result.is_ok()); // Parser could return completely wrong structure!
}
This test passed even when the parser produced ["name", "Alice", "age", 30] instead of [{"name": "Alice", "age": 30}].
Good Example
// GOOD: Verifies actual output matches expected
#[test]
fn test_sequence_of_mappings() {
let yaml = b"- name: Alice\n age: 30";
let index = YamlIndex::build(yaml).unwrap();
let json = index.to_json(yaml);
assert_eq!(json, r#"[{"name":"Alice","age":30}]"#);
}
Test Generator Pitfalls
When generating tests from external sources (like official test suites):
1. Don't Skip Cases Based on Content
# BAD: Skips tests containing quotes - misses most real-world cases
if '"' not in expected_output:
generate_comparison_test()
else:
generate_parse_only_test() # No output verification!
# GOOD: Properly escape and compare all cases
json_escaped = expected.replace('\\', '\\\\').replace('"', '\\"')
generate_comparison_test(json_escaped)
2. Count Actual Comparisons
After generating tests, verify how many actually compare output:
grep -c "assert_eq!" tests/generated_suite.rs
grep -c "is_ok()" tests/generated_suite.rs
If is_ok() count >> assert_eq! count, tests aren't verifying correctness.
3. Benchmark Generators Are Test Coverage Too
A shape that no generator emits is invisible to the entire benchmark suite, so "all benchmarks
neutral" is not evidence about it. In #106 every YAML generator emitted - (dash-space), so
block-sequence items written as a bare - on its own line had zero coverage — and hid a
quadratic path worth up to 16x. The omission was justified by a stale comment claiming the parser
required dash-space, which was never true.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 246 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A f8d672dcc44e
testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository rust-works/succinctly (51 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,132 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…