Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rust-works/succinctly. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rust-works/succinctly/main/.claude/skills/testing/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rust-works/succinctlyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rust-works/succinctly/testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rust-works/succinctly/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rust-works/succinctly/testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rust-works/succinctly/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rust-works/succinctly/testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02756 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01102 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00551 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00276 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 280 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Skill
Guidelines for writing effective tests that actually verify correctness.
Where a new yq/jq CLI test goes (#4329)
Do not append to the end of tests/yq_cli_tests.rs or tests/jq_cli_tests.rs: they are 70k and
160k lines, and an append at EOF conflicts with every other PR that does the same (about nine
a day). Put the test for issue N in tests/yq_cli/iN.rs (or tests/jq_cli/iN.rs) and edit nothing
else: the directory's mod.rs declares every file in it with automod::dir! (#5697), so there is
no mod iN; list for two PRs to conflict on. Reach the shared helpers with
use crate::{run_yq_stdin, ...};. The directory is compiled into the existing test binary (no new
target, no extra link time). cargo fmt cannot follow a macro-generated mod: format a new file
with scripts/fmt-per-issue.sh --fix (CI and scripts/pre-push.sh check with it). An incremental
cargo test does not see a new file until mod.rs is touched (touch tests/jq_cli/mod.rs).
A test for a behaviour an existing test already pins is better extended in place; do not move
existing tests.
Critical Anti-Pattern: Success-Only Tests
Never write tests that only check for successful execution without verifying output.
Bad Example (YAML test suite bug)
// BAD: Only checks parse success, not correctness
#[test]
fn test_sequence_of_mappings() {
let yaml = b"- name: Alice\n age: 30";
let result = YamlIndex::build(yaml);
assert!(result.is_ok()); // Parser could return completely wrong structure!
}
This test passed even when the parser produced ["name", "Alice", "age", 30] instead of [{"name": "Alice", "age": 30}].
Good Example
// GOOD: Verifies actual output matches expected
#[test]
fn test_sequence_of_mappings() {
let yaml = b"- name: Alice\n age: 30";
let index = YamlIndex::build(yaml).unwrap();
let json = index.to_json(yaml);
assert_eq!(json, r#"[{"name":"Alice","age":30}]"#);
}
Test Generator Pitfalls
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · +34 lines 73e1d7b7aac1
- 2mo ago First seen · 246 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A f8d672dcc44e
testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository rust-works/succinctly (52 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,756 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
testing compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| testingrust-works/succinctly | Skill | 52 | yesterday | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |