Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/rvdbreemen/adr-kit/initnpx skills add rvdbreemen/adr-kit --skill initgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rvdbreemen/adr-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rvdbreemen/adr-kit/init)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rvdbreemen/adr-kit/init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rvdbreemen/adr-kit/init.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00352 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
init scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Initialize ADR Kit (the adopt mode of setup)
Invoke explicitly with $adr-kit:init when needed.
Resolve <plugin-root> from this installed skill. Use only bundled,
local ADR Kit tools and follow this canonical workflow:
- Run the setup workflow, preview legacy ADR migration, and audit the workspace.
- Create selected reconstruction candidates as Proposed and present them in small batches.
- Use a compact confirmation grill only when the chosen decision, rationale, alternatives, and consequences have direct cited evidence; otherwise use the full grill and confirm each ADR separately.
- Install the ADR Kit-owned pre-commit gate, then state plainly that the declarative gate is free and always on while the LLM pass is on by default and costs one model call per
llm_judge: trueADR on every commit touching its scope, linear in their number and nothing at all until an author opts one in. - Record the host backend with
adr-judge --set-backend host --host-client <this client's id>rather than by writing JSON (the host model is the only backend, ADR-036; operators can override per run with ADR_KIT_LLM_CMD), never prompt for or store an API key, and add docs/adr/.adr-kit.local.json to .gitignore. - Finish with
adr-doctor --fix-index docs/adr/.
Do not contact another model or mutate user-owned instructions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 22 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 9a5ac794b7b9
init is a skill published in the GitHub repository rvdbreemen/adr-kit (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 352 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
decision-backfill
Use when auditing an existing codebase, documentation set, plans, RFCs, or git history for architecture decisions that were made but never recorded as ADRs, and when triaging potential records before drafting them.
decision-memory
Use when planning, designing, reviewing, or changing code in a repository that keeps ADRs (usually docs/adr) — to load the decisions that already govern the work, check a plan or diff against them, or record a new decision. Also use when a choice feels already-settled and you cannot find where it was settled.
bootstrap
Scaffold or retrofit documentation-led conventions (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, CONVENTIONS.md, ADR catalogue, plan/ queue, agent/ coordination) into a repo. Use when the user asks to "set up conventions", "bootstrap ADRs", "scaffold the documentation-led layout", "add AGENTS.md and a plan queue", or invokes /bootstrap.…
actual
Feature-complete companion for the actual CLI, an ADR-powered CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md generator. Runs and troubleshoots actual adr-bot, status, auth, config, runners, and models, plus the Actual AI platform surface: login, logout, whoami, and advisor (org-scoped architecture Q&A). Covers all 5 runners (claude-cli…
code-review
Review pull requests in adrkit for actionable defects and conflicts with governing architecture decisions. Use during Copilot code review to inspect changed paths, retrieve relevant ADR context through the adrkit MCP server, and produce evidence-backed inline findings.
adr-integration
This skill should be used when the user asks about "ADR integration", "ADR CI/CD", "ADR tooling", "ADR automation", "export ADRs", "ADR documentation site", or needs guidance on integrating ADRs with CI/CD, documentation sites, and other tools.