bisect

bisect is a skill for Claude Code from ryanb/dotfiles. It costs 18 tokens per session (622 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A Git workflow for finding the first commit that introduced a failure. Git bisect narrows the search by testing commits between a known working version and a failing version.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it with a test command that identifies success or failure. It checks the working tree, verifies the current failure, searches backward for a passing commit, and identifies the first bad one.
Why use it?
It reduces the number of historical commits that need manual inspection when a test currently fails.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Part of the bisect plugin — 1 skill shipped together

Good fit Use it with a test command that identifies success or failure. It checks the working tree, verifies the current failure, searches backward for a passing commit, and identifies the first bad one.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ryanb/dotfiles/bisect
About the project

ryanb/dotfiles is a collection of command-line configuration files for macOS, centered on Zsh and related tools such as Git, Ruby, Rails, and IRB. It is for developers who want to customize their terminal with commands, completions, prompts, and fuzzy-finding workflows. Its catalogue skills and plugin provide coding-agent workflows built into the same setup.

ryanb/dotfiles · 2,399 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ryanb/dotfiles --skill bisect
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ryanb/dotfiles

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install bisect, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for bisect

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ryanb/dotfiles/bisect/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ryanb/dotfiles/bisect)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ryanb/dotfiles/bisect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ryanb/dotfiles/bisect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for bisect

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ryanb/dotfiles/bisect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ryanb/dotfiles/bisect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 622 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00018 $0.00622
Opus 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00249
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00124
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00062

Measured 24d ago against content hash 19844b6833b4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

bisect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

claude/skills/bisect/SKILL.md · 79 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

bisect — Find the First Bad Commit

Use git bisect to binary-search through commit history and find the first commit that introduced a failure.

Step 1: Ensure clean working tree

Check that there are no staged or unstaged changes. If there are, stop and tell the user they need a clean working tree before bisecting, since git bisect checks out older commits.

git status --porcelain

If the output is non-empty, stop and ask the user to commit or stash their changes first.

Step 2: Determine the test command

Use $ARGUMENTS to understand what the user wants to test. This should describe a command or check that fails on the current commit. Determine the exact shell command to run.

Step 3: Verify the current commit is bad

Run the test command on the current commit (HEAD). If it passes (exits 0), stop and tell the user — the current commit doesn't exhibit the failure, so there's nothing to bisect.

Step 4: Find a good commit

Start searching backwards from HEAD in steps of 10 commits to find a commit where the test passes.

git stash --include-untracked -q 2>/dev/null; true
git checkout HEAD~10 --quiet

Run the test command. If it still fails, go back another 10 commits (HEAD~10 from the current position). Repeat until either:

  • A passing commit is found, or
  • You've gone back 100+ commits without finding a passing one — stop and ask the user for guidance (maybe a known-good commit SHA).

Once a good commit is found, note its SHA.

Step 5: Run git bisect

Return to the original branch first, then start bisecting:

git checkout - --quiet
git bisect start
git bisect bad
git bisect good <good-commit-sha>

Git will check out a middle commit. Run the test command on it:

  • If the test fails → git bisect bad
  • If the test passes → git bisect good

Repeat until git reports the first bad commit.

Step 6: Record the result and clean up

Save the first bad commit SHA and message. Then reset:

git bisect reset

Read the full file on GitHub · 79 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 24d ago Changed · +1 lines 19844b6833b4
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 294f7646c92e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

bisect is a skill published in the GitHub repository ryanb/dotfiles (2,399 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 622 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.