Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ryanportfolio/winuse-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ryanportfolio/winuse-mcp/main/.agents/skills/codex-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ryanportfolio/winuse-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ryanportfolio/winuse-mcp/codex-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ryanportfolio/winuse-mcp/codex-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ryanportfolio/winuse-mcp/codex-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ryanportfolio/winuse-mcp/codex-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ryanportfolio/winuse-mcp/codex-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.06524 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.02610 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01305 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00652 |
Grade B, and why
codex-review scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
**Model: always the newest Sol, named by its exact id.** `-m` takes a literal model id; there is no "latest Sol" alias, so the command pins one. The pin is `gpt-6.1-sol`. Before launch, check the `model` in `~/.codex/con The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · -7 tokens per session b60cd0e584be
- 26d ago Changed · +160 lines · -3 tokens per session scan A → B 41fcfe22f4ff
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 tokens per session 3d940648edb3
- 1mo ago Changed · -2 tokens per session 3f7abb6a20f8
- 2mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 036a032b79ee
codex-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ryanportfolio/winuse-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 6d ago), with no licence file. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 6,524 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
make-pr-easy-to-review
Prepare PRs for review by cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance without changing code behavior. Use for "make this easy to review", "tidy this PR", "clean up commits", or "annotate the diff".
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
security-review
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging.…
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
huggingface-llm-trainer
Train or fine-tune language models with TRL or Unsloth on Hugging Face Jobs, including SFT, DPO, GRPO, reward models, and GGUF conversion. Use for cloud LLM training; use huggingface-vision-trainer for vision tasks.