Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ryanzhao1011/workframe --skill obsidian-link-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ryanzhao1011/workframeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ryanzhao1011/workframe/obsidian-link-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ryanzhao1011/workframe/obsidian-link-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ryanzhao1011/workframe/obsidian-link-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ryanzhao1011/workframe/obsidian-link-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ryanzhao1011/workframe/obsidian-link-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01256 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00628 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00251 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
obsidian-link-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Obsidian Link Audit
定位
本 skill 是 Obsidian CLI 增强层,只做链接语义审计,不写文件。
主链路仍是本地 Markdown + rg / Read。当 Obsidian CLI 可用时,用官方 CLI 获取 Obsidian 视角下的 backlinks、outgoing links、unresolved、orphans、deadends;CLI 不可用时回退到 rg 近似查询。
触发场景
- 修改正式
spec/plan/decision前后,需要确认影响面。 - 发布到外部平台前检查坏链(由项目配备的
<platform>-publish发布器调用)。 - 单文件
rename/move前后检查引用是否更新。 - 用户问“哪些文档引用了它”“有没有坏链”“有没有孤岛文档”。
何时不用
- 只读单篇正文:直接
Read。 - 简单关键词全文检索:直接
rg更快。 - 写正文、改 frontmatter:不用本 skill,交给业务 skill /
obsidian-safe-write。 - 外部平台发布:本 skill 不负责发布,只做发布前校验。
CLI Probe
优先读取 .claude/workframe-state/obsidian-cli-status.json(schema 权威定义见 skill: obsidian-doc-structure §status.json schema):
do_not_probe: true→ 永不重新 probe(不设 TTL、不做过期自判),直接按cli_available决定走 CLI 还是 fallback;重新启用 CLI 的唯一入口 = 用户手动删除该文件- 缓存缺失 → 执行非执行检测(全程不运行任何 obsidian 命令):定位命令(
Get-Command obsidian/command -v obsidian)→ 判定是否 GUI 启动器(所在目录存在Obsidian.exe/resources.pak特征文件)→ 不可用则写入 status.json(cli_available: false、do_not_probe: true、reason)并 fallback - 仅当非执行检测确认存在独立 CLI shim 时,才允许执行
obsidian version/obsidian vault info=path验证并写入commands_verified
⚠️ 未通过非执行检测时禁止执行任何
obsidian命令——在「装了 GUI 但未启用 CLI」的机器上会误启动 Obsidian 窗口。
若不可用,记录 fallback 原因并改用 rg / Read。
调用前检查
执行任一 Obsidian CLI 命令前,必须依序确认:
status.json存在且do_not_probe: true且cli_available: false→ 直接 fallback,不做任何 probe。- 命令在
commands_verified数组中 → 可以使用 CLI。 - 命令不在数组中 → 直接 fallback,不尝试执行。
status.json不存在或 schema 不匹配 → 按「CLI Probe」的非执行检测流程重新检测(禁止直接执行 obsidian 命令)。
官方 CLI 命令
以本机 obsidian help <command> 输出为准,常用命令:
obsidian backlinks path="<file>" format=json
obsidian links path="<file>" format=json
obsidian unresolved verbose format=json
obsidian orphans format=json
obsidian deadends format=json
若本机参数名是 file= 而不是 path=,按 obsidian help backlinks / obsidian help links 调整。
Fallback
rg '\[\[[^\]]*<目标文件名>[^\]]*\]\]' projects docs
rg '\[\[' "<当前文件>"
rg "\]\([^)]*\.md\)" projects docs
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 102 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A a6f8afc009f7
obsidian-link-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository ryanzhao1011/workframe (4 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,256 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
latex-setup
Use when the user wants to set up or troubleshoot a LaTeX environment, choose between biber and bibtex, install packages for a specific venue template, or configure compilation. Triggers on phrases like "setup latex", "biber vs bibtex", "latex compilation error", "install latex packages", "venue template", or "texlive…
knowledge-structures
A system for organizing notes into navigation pages, synthesis notes, and small standalone notes. A map of content is a note that links together related notes around one topic.
html-prototype
A method for creating single-file HTML mockups that open in a browser and follow a project's design tokens, such as its fonts, colours, spacing, corners, and shadows.
feature-acceptance
A browser-based acceptance testing process that compares an online implementation with a product requirements document and, when available, an HTML prototype. It records what is complete, partial, missing, or inconsistent, with screenshots and prioritized blockers.
prd
A skill for writing and reviewing product requirements documents, or PRDs: documents that describe what a product or feature should do. It covers structure, fields, rules, edge cases, metrics, page layouts, and related system or algorithm flows.
gbg
Convert any plan, PRD, feature idea, or brief into a sequenced goal-by-goal execution document with reviewer-gated commits — for everyday feature development, MVPs, migrations, refactors, and hardening alike. Generates a project brief, per-goal scope/tasks/acceptance criteria, an LLM-reviewer prompt (Codex/etc.), a…