Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to RZX00/deepseek-harness-desktop. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RZX00/deepseek-harness-desktop/master/.agents/skills/dsh-find-simplifications/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RZX00/deepseek-harness-desktopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rzx00/deepseek-harness-desktop/dsh-find-simplifications)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rzx00/deepseek-harness-desktop/dsh-find-simplifications"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rzx00/deepseek-harness-desktop/dsh-find-simplifications/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rzx00/deepseek-harness-desktop/dsh-find-simplifications"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rzx00/deepseek-harness-desktop/dsh-find-simplifications.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.02939 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01470 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00588 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
dsh-find-simplifications scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to dsh-find-simplifications — 21 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Finding DeepSeek Harness Simplifications
This skill helps turn a broad "find things to simplify" request into evidence-backed Agent Notes that remove or collapse existing harness surface area. It is guidance, not a checklist: follow the code, keep judgment active, and prefer a few well-proven candidates over a pile of thin guesses.
Start With Repo Context
- Read
AGENTS.md, especially the pre-release stance and the conventions (including the tests-are-not-golden-truth and Agent Notes-are-not-golden-truth doctrines), plus docs/defensive-patterns.md and docs/testing.md. - Skim docs/architecture.md before judging anything under
packages/; simplifications that fight the service map or event taxonomy need extra evidence. - Use the Agent Note tree and its rules to understand intentional architecture. The most relevant implemented examples are drop mutable session summary, shared persistence write coordinator, capability seams, and the twin adapter / dual persistence backend Agent Notes.
- Treat dual LLM adapters and dual persistence backends as intentional by default. Do not propose deleting either twin/backend as "low effort" unless the user explicitly overrides that constraint. Removing an unused method or hook inside a protected seam can still be valid if it does not collapse the protected design.
What Counts As A Strong Candidate
A strong simplification removes, folds, or demotes something real and has clear evidence that the current design costs more than it buys:
- A public method, event, config knob, registry notification, helper, package, durable event, or test artifact has no production consumer.
- Tests or docs are the only consumers, and the behavior they pin is not load-bearing.
- Two representations mirror the same fact, especially across durable session events and transient
agent/*events. - A seam has methods every implementation must support but no consumer uses.
- A separate package exists only for test/demo/support code and adds publish or dependency overhead.
- A feature implements speculative product generality: multi-session/session-load, background job rosters, live registry invalidation, mid-turn steering, tool-owned UI rendering, and similar designs with no product owner.
- An invariant, rollback path, set of expected outputs, or special-case test exists only to protect an unused API.
- Hand-rolled code reimplements what a well-maintained external package or a Node builtin at the engine floor already provides, and the swap would delete the implementation plus its dedicated tests (dependency policy).
- The simplified behavior may differ slightly, but the new behavior is still reasonable and easier to explain.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 147 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A c6f0165f6aa3
dsh-find-simplifications is a skill published in the GitHub repository RZX00/deepseek-harness-desktop (10 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 2,939 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to dsh-find-simplifications, differing in 21 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…