vscode-sidebar-terminal: Skill for Codex

.codex/skills/pull/SKILL.md

pull is a skill for Codex from s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal. It costs 51 tokens per session (1,044 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of pull, MIT.

A guide for bringing the latest changes from a shared Git main branch into the current branch. It uses a merge, which combines the histories rather than rewriting them.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to fetch remote changes, update the current branch, merge main, resolve conflicts, and run project checks afterward.
Why use it?
It helps keep feature work up to date and provides a process for resolving conflicts safely.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: installed under .codex/. Also seen: mentions Codex.

This is s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal's own configuration. It tells Codex how to work on vscode-sidebar-terminal itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything vscode-sidebar-terminal configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal/main/.codex/skills/pull/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pull

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal/pull/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal/pull)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal/pull"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal/pull/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pull

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal/pull"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal/pull.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 51 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,044 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00051 $0.01044
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00522
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00209
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00104

Measured 5d ago against content hash 43650ed755e5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pull scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to pull — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.codex/skills/pull/SKILL.md · 101 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Pull

Workflow

  1. Verify git status is clean or commit/stash changes before merging.
  2. Ensure rerere is enabled locally:
    • git config rerere.enabled true
    • git config rerere.autoupdate true
  3. Confirm remotes and branches:
    • Ensure the origin remote exists.
    • Ensure the current branch is the one to receive the merge.
  4. Fetch latest refs:
    • git fetch origin
  5. Sync the remote feature branch first:
    • git pull --ff-only origin $(git branch --show-current)
    • This pulls branch updates made remotely (for example, a GitHub auto-commit) before merging origin/main.
  6. Merge in order:
    • Prefer git -c merge.conflictstyle=zdiff3 merge origin/main for clearer conflict context.
  7. If conflicts appear, resolve them (see conflict guidance below), then:
    • git add <files>
    • git commit (or git merge --continue if the merge is paused)
  8. Verify with project checks: npm run compile && npm run lint && npm run test:unit.
  9. Summarize the merge:
    • Call out the most challenging conflicts/files and how they were resolved.
    • Note any assumptions or follow-ups.

Conflict Resolution Guidance (Best Practices)

  • Inspect context before editing:
    • Use git status to list conflicted files.
    • Use git diff or git diff --merge to see conflict hunks.
    • Use git diff :1:path/to/file :2:path/to/file and git diff :1:path/to/file :3:path/to/file to compare base vs ours/theirs for a file-level view of intent.
    • With merge.conflictstyle=zdiff3, conflict markers include:
      • <<<<<<< ours, ||||||| base, ======= split, >>>>>>> theirs.
      • Matching lines near the start/end are trimmed out of the conflict region, so focus on the differing core.
    • Summarize the intent of both changes, decide the semantically correct outcome, then edit:
      • State what each side is trying to achieve (bug fix, refactor, rename, behavior change).
      • Identify the shared goal, if any, and whether one side supersedes the other.
      • Decide the final behavior first; only then craft the code to match that decision.
      • Prefer preserving invariants, API contracts, and user-visible behavior unless the conflict clearly indicates a deliberate change.
    • Open files and understand intent on both sides before choosing a resolution.
  • Prefer minimal, intention-preserving edits:
    • Keep behavior consistent with the branch’s purpose.
    • Avoid accidental deletions or silent behavior changes.
  • Resolve one file at a time and rerun tests after each logical batch.
  • Use ours/theirs only when you are certain one side should win entirely.
  • For complex conflicts, search for related files or definitions to align with the rest of the codebase.
  • For generated files, resolve non-generated conflicts first, then regenerate:
    • Prefer resolving source files and handwritten logic before touching generated artifacts.
    • Run the CLI/tooling command that produced the generated file to recreate it cleanly, then stage the regenerated output.
  • For import conflicts where intent is unclear, accept both sides first:
    • Keep all candidate imports temporarily, finish the merge, then run lint/type checks to remove unused or incorrect imports safely.
  • After resolving, ensure no conflict markers remain:
    • git diff --check
  • When unsure, note assumptions and ask for confirmation before finalizing the merge.

Read the full file on GitHub · 101 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 101 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 43650ed755e5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pull is a skill published in the GitHub repository s-hiraoku/vscode-sidebar-terminal (21 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,044 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to pull, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

prowler-commit

Creates professional git commits following conventional-commits format. Trigger: When creating commits, after completing code changes, when user asks to commit.

prowler-cloud/prowler · 33 tokens

gh-auth-isolation

Safely manage multiple GitHub identities (EMU + personal) in agent workflows.

github/gh-aw · 20 tokens

comet-github

A routing guide for Comet-related GitHub work. It directs requests about pull requests, issues, CI failures, ideas, and fixes to the appropriate review or implementation process.

rpamis/comet · 72 tokens

github-skill

Work with GitHub via the gh CLI — clone repositories, create/list/merge pull requests, create/list issues, and run any other gh command (API calls, workflow runs, releases, repo administration). List operations return parsed JSON.

zeenie-ai/OpenCompany · 51 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

codex-autoresearch

Run autonomous, measurable experiments in a Git repository: change one hypothesis, verify a numeric metric, keep improvements, and revert failures. Use when the user wants Codex to keep iterating toward a numeric target in the foreground or as a detached background run. Do not use for ordinary one-shot coding…

leo-lilinxiao/codex-autoresearch · 80 tokens