Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add s0912758806p/agentic-sop-to-work --skill draftgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/s0912758806p/agentic-sop-to-workWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/s0912758806p/agentic-sop-to-work/draft)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s0912758806p/agentic-sop-to-work/draft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s0912758806p/agentic-sop-to-work/draft/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s0912758806p/agentic-sop-to-work/draft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s0912758806p/agentic-sop-to-work/draft.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00467 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00234 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
draft scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Skill — draft（起草／依審查意見修訂）
圖示範流程（workflow/examples/graph.json）的第 1 步，也是有界退回邊的目標節點。
綁定的單一工具
python3（標準庫）。本 skill 只此一個工具。
依賴（完整宣告；缺項由 kit.require_deps 明確報錯，非靜默）
python>= 3.8
參數化（無硬編碼）
- 輸入：
--in <verdict artifact.json ／ 不存在皆可> - 輸出：
--out <draft artifact.json>
介面
- 輸入 artifact：
verdict@1（讀data.defects與data.round）。 輸入不存在或不是verdict@1→ 視為初稿（第一次進入節點時$RUN/verdict.json還沒產生）。 - 輸出 artifact：
draft@1—data{defects, round, addressed[]}。
為何無狀態
「這是第幾輪」由上游 artifact 攜帶，不靠隱含計數器：同一份輸入重跑永遠得到同一結果 （確定性），而重訪之所以會前進，是因為上一輪的 verdict 真的被讀進來了。
執行
python3 skills/draft/tool.py --in <$RUN/verdict.json> --out <$RUN/draft.json>
獨立重用
skills/draft/ + lib/kit.py 可單獨抽出；只要給得出 verdict@1（或不給）即可運作。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 34 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 6d3e16abd044
draft is a skill published in the GitHub repository s0912758806p/agentic-sop-to-work (206 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 467 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other skills, from other repositories
x-bug2rag
A knowledge-capture tool that turns reusable bug explanations into a local RAG collection, meaning a searchable store of text that an agent can retrieve later. It records the trigger, incorrect implementation, correct implementation, and observable difference.
x-spec2
A compact system-design guide for turning vague or cross-module requests into a small, structured specification package. It defines requirements, acceptance scenarios, module boundaries, and—when needed—data flow, state, timing, resources, or recovery design.
x-qdev
A compact development workflow for a small, clearly defined code change. It keeps the requirement, initially failing tests, implementation, and real verification results in one task document, following TDD, or test-driven development.
x-adversarial-risk
A focused adversarial review of a software specification. It tries to find small counterexamples that would expose incorrect implementations, such as invalid state changes, crashes, duplicate actions, permission mistakes, or concurrent events.
triage-mode
Triage mode operational spec for the team lead. Returns lead identity, facilitator identity, mode-specific rules, suggest-members guidance, and phase arc for triage teams that diagnose an issue without changing it.
writing-mode
Writing mode operational spec for the team lead. Returns lead identity, facilitator identity, ownership boundaries, editorial baseline, suggest-members guidance, and phase arc for writing-mode teams.