Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add s1vanov/follow-up --skill follow-upgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/s1vanov/follow-upWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/s1vanov/follow-up/follow-up)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s1vanov/follow-up/follow-up"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s1vanov/follow-up/follow-up/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s1vanov/follow-up/follow-up"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s1vanov/follow-up/follow-up.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00460 | $0.10384 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00230 | $0.05192 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00092 | $0.02077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00046 | $0.01038 |
Grade A, and why
follow-up scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 586 lines · 460 tokens per session scan A f29f10cc147d
follow-up is a skill published in the GitHub repository s1vanov/follow-up (2 stars, last pushed 21d ago), with no licence file. It adds 460 tokens to every session and 10,384 once invoked, about $0.0023 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-meeting-notes
Messy notes → Clear action items. Instantly. Paste any meeting notes, transcript, or text. Get summaries, action items with owners and deadlines. Auto-saved, searchable, with integrated to-do tracking. No bot. No subscription. No setup.
scheduling
Set up recurring or scheduled work — anything the user wants run on a schedule, repeatedly, or at a future time ("every morning", "each weekday at 9am", "daily digest", "weekly report", "remind me", "run this on a cron"). Teaches how to author a durable Vexa Scheduler routine that survives restarts. Use this instead…
minutes-mirror
Self-coaching analysis of your own behavior across meetings — talk-time ratio, filler words, hedging language, monologue length, energy patterns, and (when meetings are tagged via /minutes-tag) what your behavior in winning meetings looks like vs losing ones. Use this whenever the user says "how did I do", "review my…
minutes-debrief
Post-meeting debrief — analyzes what happened, compares outcomes to your prep intentions, tracks decision evolution. Use when the user says "debrief", "what just happened in that meeting", "what did we decide", "debrief that call", "post-meeting", "what changed", or right after stopping a recording.
minutes-live-sidekick
Act as the user's live meeting sidekick inside the current terminal agent session. Use when the user explicitly asks you, the terminal agent, to watch a meeting, follow the live transcript, answer during the call, offer strategist thoughts, silently watch for risks, or track decisions. Do not use this skill to start…
minutes-record
Start or stop recording a meeting, call, or voice memo. Use this whenever the user says "record", "start recording", "capture this meeting", "stop recording", "I'm in a meeting", "take notes on this call", or wants to transcribe live audio. Also use when they ask about recording status or want to know if something is…