Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add S3YED/appie-kit --skill ad-creative-new-anglesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/S3YED/appie-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/ad-creative-new-angles)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/ad-creative-new-angles"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/ad-creative-new-angles/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/ad-creative-new-angles"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/ad-creative-new-angles.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.00911 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00182 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
ad-creative-new-angles scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ad Creative — New Angles, Same DNA (Prompt 2)
Part of the ad-creative-variations family. Full context: ../ad-creative-variations/SKILL.md.
When to use
- The brief from
ad-creative-analyze-winnerrecommended "USE PROMPT 2" or "USE BOTH". - If the text angle was WEAK,
ad-creative-fix-weak-anglemust run first — feed its Top Pick in here (see below), never the original weak headline.
Prerequisites
- The full brief from
ad-creative-analyze-winner, verbatim. - If the text angle was WEAK: the Top Pick (headline, subheadline, emotional trigger) from
ad-creative-fix-weak-angle. - Optionally: up to 5 hooks from
ad-creative-generate-hooks. - The winning ad image again.
- The target market/language.
Procedure
Assemble the prompt below. Include the "WEAK" block only if the text angle was weak; include the hooks block only if hooks were generated. Delete whichever blocks don't apply — do not leave placeholder text in the final prompt.
Based on this winning ad brief:
[PASTE HERE: full output from Prompt 1]
--- ONLY FILL IN IF TEXT ANGLE WAS "WEAK" — otherwise delete this block ---
IMPORTANT: The original text angle was weak and has been replaced.
Ignore the original headline in the brief. Use this improved text angle
as the new baseline for tone, claim and direction of all 5 variations:
* New headline: [PASTE HERE: headline from Top Pick]
* New subheadline: [PASTE HERE: subheadline from Top Pick]
* Emotional trigger: [PASTE HERE: trigger from Top Pick]
--- END OF BLOCK ---
--- ONLY FILL IN IF YOU HAVE HOOKS FROM THE HOOK PROMPT — otherwise delete ---
Use these pre-approved hooks. Match each hook to the variation
with the same angle:
* Hook 1: [PASTE HERE: hook + subheadline]
* Hook 2: [PASTE HERE: hook + subheadline]
* Hook 3: [PASTE HERE: hook + subheadline]
* Hook 4: [PASTE HERE: hook + subheadline]
* Hook 5: [PASTE HERE: hook + subheadline]
--- END OF BLOCK ---
I will upload the winning ad as a reference image.
Create 5 Higgsfield (Nano Banana 2) prompts that:
1. Keep the exact winning visual DNA and format from the brief
2. Attack from a completely different angle each time:
Variation 1: Problem awareness angle
Variation 2: Myth/belief breaking angle
Variation 3: Pure proof angle
Variation 4: Educational/informational angle
Variation 5: Direct/aggressive result angle
Rules for each prompt:
* Feel FRESH and scroll-stopping
* Never repeat the same hook or headline
* All text in [LANGUAGE/MARKET]
* Before/after format allowed and encouraged if it fits
* Only include brand name, logo and product if they were present
in the original winning ad
* Use winning ad as reference for layout and style
* Target audience: same as winning ad brief
* Clean ad creative only
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 85 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 13efeadd1e38
ad-creative-new-angles is a skill published in the GitHub repository S3YED/appie-kit (9 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 911 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
browser-edge-cases
SOP for debugging browser automation failures on complex websites. Use when browser tools fail on specific sites like LinkedIn, Twitter/X, SPAs, or sites with Shadow DOM.
aws-patterns
Lambda best practices, S3 event patterns, SQS/SNS fanout, and DynamoDB access patterns for serverless AWS architectures.
review
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use…
agents-md-protocol
Create or review an AGENTS.md file so coding agents get stable repo-local instructions: environment setup, testing, style, security boundaries, PR policy, and handoff rules. Use when a repo lacks durable agent guidance or when a custom harness needs a predictable context file.
investment-memo-generator
Investment memo creation combining financial analysis, document generation, and structured templates. Use when creating investment memos, pitch decks, deal summaries, or investment committee materials.
python-memory-safe-scripts
Memory-safe Python script patterns for long-running processes under systemd MemoryMax constraints. Covers allocator purge (mimalloc/glibc malloctrim), HTTP response lifecycle, DataFrame cleanup, thread-local connection reuse, and periodic GC cadence. Battle-tested through 5 OOM optimization cycles on production GPU…