Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add S3YED/appie-kit --skill plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/S3YED/appie-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00457 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00183 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to plan — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Plan Mode
Use this skill when the user wants a plan instead of execution.
Core behavior
For this turn, you are planning only.
- Do not implement code.
- Do not edit project files except the plan markdown file.
- Do not run mutating terminal commands, commit, push, or perform external actions.
- You may inspect the repo or other context with read-only commands/tools when needed.
- Your deliverable is a markdown plan saved inside the active workspace under
.hermes/plans/.
Output requirements
Write a markdown plan that is concrete and actionable.
Include, when relevant:
- Goal
- Current context / assumptions
- Proposed approach
- Step-by-step plan
- Files likely to change
- Tests / validation
- Risks, tradeoffs, and open questions
If the task is code-related, include exact file paths, likely test targets, and verification steps.
Save location
Save the plan with write_file under:
.hermes/plans/YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS-<slug>.md
Treat that as relative to the active working directory / backend workspace. Hermes file tools are backend-aware, so using this relative path keeps the plan with the workspace on local, docker, ssh, modal, and daytona backends.
If the runtime provides a specific target path, use that exact path.
If not, create a sensible timestamped filename yourself under .hermes/plans/.
Interaction style
- If the request is clear enough, write the plan directly.
- If no explicit instruction accompanies
/plan, infer the task from the current conversation context. - If it is genuinely underspecified, ask a brief clarifying question instead of guessing.
- After saving the plan, reply briefly with what you planned and the saved path.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A ecb0b3bf5eed
plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository S3YED/appie-kit (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 457 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to plan, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
seo-geo-optimizer
Comprehensive SEO/GEO/AEO analysis toolkit for optimizing content visibility across traditional search engines (Google, Bing), AI platforms (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grokipedia), answer engines (Google AI Overviews, Bing Copilot, featured snippets), voice assistants (Google Assistant, Siri, Alexa), and…
internal-linking-optimizer
An analysis tool for the links within a website. Internal links are links from one page of a site to another page on the same site.
geo-review-html
Render an interactive, self-contained HTML companion for a GEO content brief (04-content-brief) or a publish-ready draft (05-production), so a NON-technical client reviewer (founder, organizer staff, the domain expert filling slots) can fill REQUIRED-FILL slots, leave section-level comments, and approve/return work in…
geo-pipeline
Entry point + orchestrator for the recomby-geo GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) workflow on OpenAI Codex CLI. Use when the user wants to run any stage of the GEO pipeline on a client folder — intake, visibility audit, content-gap analysis, content brief, draft production, distribution, or monthly re-audit — or…
content-quality-auditor
A content review skill that scores writing against 80 quality checks covering expertise, trust, search visibility, and readiness to publish. E-E-A-T means experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness.
content-writer
Write SEO-optimized blog posts, landing pages, and long-form page copy following Google's E-E-A-T and Helpful Content guidelines. Handles new content creation from a keyword, topic, or brief, and full-page rewrites. Use when asked to "write a blog post", "create a landing page", "write content about X", "content for…