Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add S3YED/appie-kit --skill profile-funnel-meta-adsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/S3YED/appie-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/profile-funnel-meta-ads)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/profile-funnel-meta-ads"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/profile-funnel-meta-ads/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/profile-funnel-meta-ads"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/profile-funnel-meta-ads.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.01035 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
profile-funnel-meta-ads scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Profile Funnel + Meta Ads
The Profile Funnel: send paid traffic to your IG profile (not a landing page) so your content ecosystem does the filtering and conversion. "Creates new eyeballs with every dollar spent, attracting the highest-quality leads."
Prerequisites (must be in place first)
- Clarity on ICP + their painpoints.
- Content that triggers that ICP (see
instagram-organic-content). - Credibility / proof of concept (yours or clients').
- An irresistible offer presented on sales calls (see
consulting-offer-and-pricing). - A named mechanism to reference in content (e.g. "the Profile Funnel").
Ad-creative scripting
Same 3 types as organic, but each ends in a CTA. 4-beat flow: Hook (max 4s, painpoint not profile) → Mechanism Reveal → Proof Layer → CTA (DM keyword or value asset).
- Value: top face / bottom screen of the system in Ads Manager / Miro; zoom on ONE key number (ROAS, CPM, sales jump).
- Educational: mic/authority bg + cutaway charts; hook = belief-breaker.
- Credibility: client screenshots (Stripe, Ads Manager, dashboards), case-study sheet, 1:1 zoom clip; numbers + social proof.
Hook rule — wrong: "If you're a coach looking for…"; right: "You're running ads but every lead is cold and barely replies — here's why…". CTA = "Comment 'PROFILE' and I'll send the full breakdown."
Launch: Business Manager vs Boosting
| Pros | Cons | |
|---|---|---|
| Business Manager | Pixel, custom, multiple adsets, best for testing/volume/tracking | More complex; sometimes lower lead quality |
| Boost post | Fast, simple | Less data, harder to track |
Best combo: test in Business Manager → boost the already-proven winning ad to scale.
Business Manager launch SOP
- Account setup: business.facebook.com → business info + FB profile → connect IG + payment method. (Follow a current YT tutorial; UI changes often.)
- Campaign: create a new campaign.
- Adset: name + conversion objective; set destination, bid control, value rules.
- Budget: min $25/day (test 4-7 days) → max $300/day (test 3 days). More budget = faster data.
- Audience — pick one:
- Broad (no interest): custom age/gender, leave interests blank — let the scripting do the heavy lifting. Default choice.
- Niched (with interest): add interests; one adset per interest for clean tracking (split when budget allows, e.g. $50 each on 3 interests vs $50 on a combined adset).
- Lookalike: only when you have a bigger following / good engagement to build a custom-audience seed.
- Geo (international offer): US, UK, Canada, Australia, NL/DE/DK/ES/IT, Singapore. Local offer → your region only.
- Creative: attach the scripted creative.
- Retargeting adset (optional): spend on prior profile visitors at low budget (~$10/day).
- Launch: go back to the campaign (top-left) → Publish to launch everything at once.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 65 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 01b5d85a305a
profile-funnel-meta-ads is a skill published in the GitHub repository S3YED/appie-kit (9 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 1,035 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
browser-edge-cases
SOP for debugging browser automation failures on complex websites. Use when browser tools fail on specific sites like LinkedIn, Twitter/X, SPAs, or sites with Shadow DOM.
aws-patterns
Lambda best practices, S3 event patterns, SQS/SNS fanout, and DynamoDB access patterns for serverless AWS architectures.
review
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use…
agents-md-protocol
Create or review an AGENTS.md file so coding agents get stable repo-local instructions: environment setup, testing, style, security boundaries, PR policy, and handoff rules. Use when a repo lacks durable agent guidance or when a custom harness needs a predictable context file.
investment-memo-generator
Investment memo creation combining financial analysis, document generation, and structured templates. Use when creating investment memos, pitch decks, deal summaries, or investment committee materials.
impact-report-writer
Nonprofit/NGO impact report generation with data visualization suggestions, outcome metrics, narrative structure, and program data presentation. Use when writing impact reports, annual reports, or program evaluation summaries.