writing-plans

writing-plans is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from S3YED/appie-kit. It costs 36 tokens per session (1,770 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of writing-plans, MIT.

A guide for writing detailed implementation plans for multi-step software changes. It turns requirements into small actions with file paths, code examples, tests, and verification steps; TDD means writing a failing test before the code that makes it pass.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before building features, breaking down complex requirements, or delegating work to other agents.
Why use it?
It reduces guesswork when someone else, or a future version of you, must implement a feature without knowing the codebase or problem domain.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it before building features, breaking down complex requirements, or delegating work to other agents.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/s3yed/appie-kit/writing-plans
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add S3YED/appie-kit --skill writing-plans
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/S3YED/appie-kit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for writing-plans

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/writing-plans/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/writing-plans)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/writing-plans/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for writing-plans

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s3yed/appie-kit/writing-plans.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,770 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 91% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.01770
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00708
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00354
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00177

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 15c28bcbd1ee, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

writing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

91% identical to writing-plans — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/automation/software-development/writing-plans/SKILL.md · 297 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 297 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Writing Implementation Plans

Overview

Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the implementer has zero context for the codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need: which files to touch, complete code, testing commands, docs to check, how to verify. Give them bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.

Assume the implementer is a skilled developer but knows almost nothing about the toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.

Core principle: A good plan makes implementation obvious. If someone has to guess, the plan is incomplete.

When to Use

Always use before:

  • Implementing multi-step features
  • Breaking down complex requirements
  • Delegating to subagents via subagent-driven-development

Don't skip when:

  • Feature seems simple (assumptions cause bugs)
  • You plan to implement it yourself (future you needs guidance)
  • Working alone (documentation matters)

Bite-Sized Task Granularity

Each task = 2-5 minutes of focused work.

Every step is one action:

  • "Write the failing test" — step
  • "Run it to make sure it fails" — step
  • "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" — step
  • "Run the tests and make sure they pass" — step
  • "Commit" — step

Too big:

### Task 1: Build authentication system
[50 lines of code across 5 files]

Right size:

### Task 1: Create User model with email field
[10 lines, 1 file]

### Task 2: Add password hash field to User
[8 lines, 1 file]

### Task 3: Create password hashing utility
[15 lines, 1 file]

Plan Document Structure

Header (Required)

Every plan MUST start with:

# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan

> **For Hermes:** Use subagent-driven-development skill to implement this plan task-by-task.

**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]

**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]

**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]

---

Task Structure

Read the full file on GitHub · 297 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 297 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 15c28bcbd1ee

Subscribe to this mod's changes

writing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository S3YED/appie-kit (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,770 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to writing-plans, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

internal-linking-optimizer

An analysis tool for the links within a website. Internal links are links from one page of a site to another page on the same site.

ViryaZheng/recomby-geo · 38 tokens

seo-geo-optimizer

Comprehensive SEO/GEO/AEO analysis toolkit for optimizing content visibility across traditional search engines (Google, Bing), AI platforms (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grokipedia), answer engines (Google AI Overviews, Bing Copilot, featured snippets), voice assistants (Google Assistant, Siri, Alexa), and…

ViryaZheng/recomby-geo · 121 tokens

geo-review-html

Render an interactive, self-contained HTML companion for a GEO content brief (04-content-brief) or a publish-ready draft (05-production), so a NON-technical client reviewer (founder, organizer staff, the domain expert filling slots) can fill REQUIRED-FILL slots, leave section-level comments, and approve/return work in…

ViryaZheng/recomby-geo · 140 tokens

geo-pipeline

Entry point + orchestrator for the recomby-geo GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) workflow on OpenAI Codex CLI. Use when the user wants to run any stage of the GEO pipeline on a client folder — intake, visibility audit, content-gap analysis, content brief, draft production, distribution, or monthly re-audit — or…

ViryaZheng/recomby-geo · 169 tokens

content-quality-auditor

A content review skill that scores writing against 80 quality checks covering expertise, trust, search visibility, and readiness to publish. E-E-A-T means experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness.

ViryaZheng/recomby-geo · 44 tokens

content-writer

Write SEO-optimized blog posts, landing pages, and long-form page copy following Google's E-E-A-T and Helpful Content guidelines. Handles new content creation from a keyword, topic, or brief, and full-page rewrites. Use when asked to "write a blog post", "create a landing page", "write content about X", "content for…

ViryaZheng/recomby-geo · 163 tokens