Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add s977043/river-review --skill react-router-action-contractgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/s977043/river-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/s977043/river-review/react-router-action-contract)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s977043/river-review/react-router-action-contract"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s977043/river-review/react-router-action-contract/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/s977043/river-review/react-router-action-contract"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/s977043/river-review/react-router-action-contract.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00971 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
React Router Action Contract Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pattern declaration
Primary pattern: Reviewer Secondary patterns: Inversion Why: action のエラー契約と ErrorBoundary 分岐をチェックリスト型で検査する
Goal / 目的
- バリデーション失敗が ErrorBoundary へ throw され、フォームのインラインエラー表示と自動 revalidation の制御が壊れるのを防ぐ。
- action 成功時の
redirect()欠落による再送信問題、エラー返却時のステータス不備(2xx のまま)を検出する。
Non-goals / 扱わないこと
- loader / data loading の規約(
react-router-loader-boundaryのスコープ)。 - Form と fetcher のどちらを使うべきかの UX 判断(要件依存のため一律指摘しない。質問に留める)。
- バリデーションライブラリの選定。
Pre-execution Gate / 実行前ゲート
このスキルは以下の条件がすべて満たされない限りNO_REVIEWを返す。
- 差分に action / clientAction の追加・変更、または ErrorBoundary の変更が含まれている
- diff コンテキストが利用可能である
ゲート不成立時の出力: NO_REVIEW: react-router-action-contract — action / ErrorBoundary の変更なし
False-positive guards / 抑制条件
throw data("Not Found", { status: 404 })等、リソース不在・認可エラーの 意図的な throw は公式に許可された規約であり指摘しない(バリデーション失敗の throw と区別する)。- React Router 管理外の外部 API へ直接 POST する設計が要件上正当な場合は指摘しない。
- 成功時に同一ページへ結果を表示する設計(redirect しない)が意図的な場合は質問に留める。
Rule / ルール
- 期待されるバリデーション失敗は
return data({ errors }, { status: 400 })で返す(throw しない。2xx のままだと不要な revalidation が走る点も確認)。 - 成功時は
redirect()で再送信問題を防ぐ。 - ErrorBoundary は
isRouteErrorResponse(error)/error instanceof Error/ その他 の 3 分岐で処理し、error.messageへの直接アクセスを避ける。 - 独立して失敗してよい UI 単位にはルート単位の ErrorBoundary を検討する(root のみでも最低限は満たすため、強制はしない)。
Evidence / 根拠の取り方
- 指摘は
<file>:<line>で差分に紐づけ、公式規約(form-validation / error-boundary)を 1 行で添える。
Output / 出力(短文版の推奨)
コメントは日本語で返す。
- Finding: どの契約に反しているか(1文)
- Impact: インラインエラー不能 / 再送信 / 不要 revalidation 等
- Fix:
data({errors}, {status: 400})/redirect()/ 3 分岐の最小修正案
Sources / 出典
- React Router — Form Validation: https://reactrouter.com/how-to/form-validation
- React Router — Error Boundaries: https://reactrouter.com/how-to/error-boundary
- React Router — Actions: https://reactrouter.com/start/framework/actions
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 9dfb34cf9021
React Router Action Contract Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository s977043/river-review (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 971 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
logic-review
Find logic bugs in a single file or function via semi-formal execution tracing (Premises → Trace → Divergence → Trigger → Remedy). Trigger when a user shares code and suspects something is wrong without naming a concrete failure — phrases like "review this", "does this look right", "check this function", "audit this…
logic-fix-all
Autonomous repository-wide audit-and-fix pipeline: health → review → locate/explain → fix → diff-verify → iterate until clean. Starts with a mandatory consent prompt (token-intensive); after consent runs hands-free. Trigger when the user wants ALL logic issues found and fixed — "fix everything", "fix all logic…
logic-health
Sweep a directory, module, or full codebase for logic correctness and produce a scored health dashboard with systemic patterns. Trigger when the user requests a health view — "audit the whole codebase", "health check", "health overview", "logic health overview", "audit src/", "audit auth and payments modules", "where…
run-iteration-eval
Run the Logic-Lens content-eval pipeline for one iteration and produce a scored summary.json — use to measure a skill change. Wraps scripts/run-content-evals.sh (runner, costs tokens) and scripts/grade-iteration.py (grader, free, re-runnable). ALWAYS sync the plugin cache first. Use when the user wants to "run the…
sync-skill-cache
Sync the Logic-Lens working-copy skills/ into the installed plugin cache so content-evals test the EDITED skill, not the last published one. ALWAYS run this after editing any skills//SKILL.md or guide/shared file and BEFORE running content-evals — otherwise the eval silently grades stale content and every token is…
bump-version
Bump the Logic-Lens version across all six metadata locations at once (package.json, the four plugin manifests, and the README badge), then validate. Use when cutting a release or when npm run validate reports a version mismatch.