Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to saadnvd1/agent-os. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/saadnvd1/agent-os/main/.claude/skills/do-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saadnvd1/agent-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saadnvd1/agent-os/do-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saadnvd1/agent-os/do-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saadnvd1/agent-os/do-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saadnvd1/agent-os/do-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saadnvd1/agent-os/do-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.02456 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00982 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00491 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00246 |
Grade A, and why
do-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code review
Run the relevant review agents from .claude/agents/ in parallel, have review-finding-verifier check every finding against the code, and report what survives in one list ranked by severity. Then fix.
This review is optional and costs about nine agents. What merges require is the orchestrator's independent review of the PR's exact head (lib/tasks/code-review.ts, enforced by sign_off and stacks' land), which AgentOS runs itself. Run this one when the change is risky enough to want a deeper look before the PR, or when the user asks for it. For a narrower look, run only the agents that matter.
Process
1. Gather the changes and the goal
Changed files. With a PR number: gh pr diff <NUMBER> --name-only (right for stacked PRs too). Otherwise: git diff main...HEAD --name-status -M plus git status --short --untracked-files=all, so uncommitted, new and renamed files count. For a stacked task, diff against the branch the PR targets, not main.
The goal: what this change was asked to do. Take the first of these that exists, and add the next ones when they add detail:
- The task prompt this session was started with (an AgentOS task's first message), or the PR body:
gh pr view <NUMBER> --json title,body - The LumifyHub card named in the branch, PR title or prompt (through the
lhCLI; load thelhskill first) - The plan in
docs/plans/the prompt or card points at (local only, gitignored) - The commit messages and this conversation
Write it as a short brief: what was asked for, the "done when" list, and the links. With no goal at all, skip review-spec-compliance and say so at the top of the report.
2. Select agents
| Condition | Agent |
|---|---|
| A goal was found in step 1 | review-spec-compliance |
server.ts, lib/security/, lib/connect/, app/api/, mcp/, bin/, scripts/, lib/orchestrator/, lib/chat/, lib/lumifyhub/, or any file calling exec/spawn/execFile, reading a request, a header, a path or a file, or building a prompt |
review-security |
lib/orchestrator/, lib/tasks/, lib/stacks/, lib/tasks/brief.ts, or a route or tool that starts, approves, merges or drops work |
review-orchestrator-safety |
lib/chat/, lib/db/, server.ts, lib/stacks/, lib/tasks/, a watcher or background loop, or any app/api/ route |
review-durability |
app/ pages and layouts, components/, hooks/, data/, stores/, contexts/, styles/ (not app/api/) |
review-frontend |
Any .ts/.tsx implementation or *.test.ts(x) file, vitest.config.mts or vitest.setup.ts |
review-test-quality |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · -38 tokens per session fcdd44e773d7
- 14d ago Changed fd7aa2875cad
- 15d ago Changed bdce14f91213
- 16d ago Changed ff7a43e80915
- 17d ago Changed · -7 lines · +13 tokens per session a6f41f98f7b6
- 18d ago Changed 12a747d2ae79
- 22d ago First seen · 129 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 75bf761bc697
do-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository saadnvd1/agent-os (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 2,456 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
autofix-pr
Watch a pull request and fix it from a worktree of its own - CI failures, review feedback from trusted authors and merge conflicts are fixed, pushed to the PR branch and answered on the PR under the user's git and gh identity. Usage - /autofix-pr [ | ] [--once] [--every ] [--no-reply] [--yes] [instructions]…
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
hunk-launch-video
Produces Hunk videos by driving the real TUI headlessly in a PTY, compositing captioned 1080p frames in Chromium, and encoding with ffmpeg. Use for feature demos, workflow explainers, announcements, launch videos, and full-release roundups.
hunk-release
Prepares, publishes, verifies, and curates Hunk releases. Use for release metadata, benchmarks, tags, publishing, release videos, backports, or recovery.
git
Git and code hosting platform management — GitHub, GitLab, Codeberg, Forgejo. Zero barrier — install x-cmd and manage repos from the terminal. Use for "git", "github", "gitlab", "repo", "pull request", "code hosting".
vhs-e2e-gif
Record a test run, a TUI session, or any terminal command as a GIF with VHS and attach it to a GitHub PR as a release-hosted asset, never a repo commit. Use when asked to record an e2e run, demo a fix on a PR, attach a GIF or screen recording to a pull request, show a test passing visually, or produce a terminal…