Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/main/.claude/skills/review-workflow/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00596 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00298 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
review-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review workflow
- Analyze the request; identify affected files (graphify/codegraph first, not repo scans). Pre-harvest the paths + signatures into a handoff file
.claude/scratch/<task>.md(copyHANDOFF_TEMPLATE.md) so no stage cold-re-explores. - Select the pair by Ownership precedence: the area's author (implements) + its independent critic, plus a Secondary critic only if the change is risk-bearing in that column (
tauri-security-reviewer,performance-profiler,ui-ux-expert). ≤3 critics total. - Plan the minimal change (in the handoff).
- Implement — the domain author makes minimal changes (reads the handoff first; loads
author-contract). Rust-first for business logic / pipelines / ATS / document generation; the renderer stays presentation-focused. The author appends what changed to the handoff. - Test stage (conditional) — if
touchesTestableLogic(diff)(Part D predicate):test-authorwrites/updates tests →testing-revieweraudits coverage of the changed code. This stage is separate from the ≤3-critic cap. STRICT: changed non-trivial logic without a test — or a weak/tautological/mock-asserting test that doesn't exercise the change — is HIGH (blocking), not advisory; the error/edge path must be covered, not just the happy path. - Review — the independent critic (never the author) audits the diff against its checklist and appends severity-tagged findings to the handoff; HIGH/CRITICAL block → author resolves → re-audit; LOW/MEDIUM advisory. For genuinely parallel, file-disjoint, multi-domain work, run this as native Agent Teams (the lead spawns authors as teammates owning disjoint files; critics challenge via the mailbox); otherwise sequential subagents (cheaper).
- Verify correctness — run the relevant tests/build (
pnpm test,cargo test). - Verify performance — if a hot path was touched →
performance-profiler. - Verify security — if risk-bearing →
tauri-security-reviewer(HIGH/CRITICAL blocks). - Docs + lessons —
project-stewardsyncs affected docs/knowledge, runsgraphify update ., and persists any durable lesson.
No feature is "done" without tests (when the predicate is positive) or without docs sync.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 20 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 3e845301dfc7
review-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app (55 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 596 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
anarlog
Query Anarlog meetings, notes, summaries, transcripts, participants, action items, and recurring history. Use when a user asks about their Anarlog meeting data or needs meeting context for another task.
ramble
Run a human-feedback loop through RambleDesk. Hard trigger: when the user invokes /ramble, $ramble, [$ramble], or says to use RambleDesk/ramble feedback, create a RambleDesk request before answering the substance unless they explicitly say not to send one. Also use when real human judgment, review, approval, or…
resume-builder
Generate professional resumes that conform to the Reactive Resume schema. Use when the user wants to create, build, or generate a resume through conversational AI, or asks about resume structure, sections, or content. This skill guides the agent to ask clarifying questions, avoid hallucination, and produce valid JSON…
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
review-ticket
Review a ticket or PR through focused specialist lenses: scope, architecture, security, tests, AC coverage, and PR metadata.