Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill --skill app-store-review-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill/app-store-review-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill/app-store-review-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill/app-store-review-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill/app-store-review-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill/app-store-review-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.02782 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01391 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00556 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00278 |
Grade A, and why
app-store-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 244 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
App Store Review Guidelines Checker
Comprehensive guide for evaluating iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, and visionOS app code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. This skill covers EVERY guideline point to identify potential rejection issues before submission.
Supports: Swift, Objective-C, React Native, and Expo apps
Guidelines current through: Apple's June 8, 2026 App Review Guidelines update (verified still current as of August 29, 2026). Also incorporates post-June policy announcements: social media age-rating questions (mandatory September 2026), Republic of Korea age rating changes (August/October 2026), and Brazil/EU alternative payment and distribution terms.
When to Apply
Use this skill when:
- Preparing an app for App Store submission
- Reviewing code for compliance issues
- Implementing features that may trigger review concerns
- Auditing existing apps for guideline violations
- Building features involving payments, user data, or sensitive content
Guideline Sections
Read individual rule files for detailed explanations, checklists, and code examples:
| Section | File | Key Topics |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Safety | rules/1-safety.md | Objectionable content, UGC moderation, Kids Category, physical harm, data security |
| 2. Performance | rules/2-performance.md | App completeness, metadata accuracy, hardware compatibility, software requirements |
| 3. Business | rules/3-business.md | In-app purchase, subscriptions, cryptocurrencies, other business models |
| 4. Design | rules/4-design.md | Copycats, minimum functionality, spam, extensions, Apple services, login |
| 5. Legal | rules/5-legal.md | Privacy, data collection, intellectual property, gambling, VPN, MDM, developer code of conduct |
Risk Levels by Category
| Risk Level | Category | Section | Common Rejection Reasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL | Privacy & Data | 5.1 | Missing privacy policy, unauthorized data collection |
| CRITICAL | Payments | 3.1 | Bypassing in-app purchase, unclear pricing |
| HIGH | Safety | 1.x | Objectionable content, inadequate UGC moderation |
| HIGH | Performance | 2.x | Crashes, incomplete features, deprecated APIs |
| MEDIUM | Design | 4.x | Copycat apps, minimum functionality issues |
| MEDIUM | Legal | 5.x | IP violations, gambling without license |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed ff7cd05d0ad3
- 13d ago First seen · 244 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 956c7a200757
app-store-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill (337 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 2,782 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
play-policy-insights
Automated auditor designed to verify Android applications against Google Play Policy domains. It cross-references static code analysis with Play Store declarations to generate deterministic compliance reports, identifying undeclared data collection, architectural risks, and missing disclosures across Permissions and…
app-store-preflight-compliance
Pre-submission compliance scanner workflow for Apple App Store apps. Use when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS projects (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, Expo) for App Store rejection risks, submission readiness, privacy compliance, or guideline violations.
account-deletion
Generates an Apple-compliant account deletion flow with multi-step confirmation UI, optional data export, configurable grace period, Keychain cleanup, and server-side deletion request. Use when user needs account deletion, right-to-delete, or Apple App Review compliance for account removal.
consent-flow
Generates GDPR/CCPA/DPDP privacy consent flows with granular category preferences, consent state persistence, audit logging, and ATT (App Tracking Transparency) integration. Use when user needs privacy consent UI, cookie/tracking consent, or compliance management.
appstore-review-checker
Audit iOS/macOS apps against App Store Review Guidelines before submission, with evidence-backed verdicts and fixes. Don't use for Google Play, general code review, or rejection appeals.
gplay-submission-checks
Pre-submission validation for Google Play releases covering metadata, screenshots, bundle integrity, data safety, and policy compliance. Use when preparing a release to avoid rejections and catch issues before submitting.