Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill --skill app-store-review-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill/app-store-review-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill/app-store-review-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill/app-store-review-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill/app-store-review-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill/app-store-review-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.03902 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.01561 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00780 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00390 |
Grade A, and why
app-store-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 280 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
App Store Review Guidelines Checker
Comprehensive guide for evaluating iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, and visionOS app code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. This skill covers EVERY guideline point to identify potential rejection issues before submission.
Supports: Swift, Objective-C, React Native, and Expo apps
Guidelines current through: Apple's October 16, 2026 App Review Guidelines update, verified against the current English guidelines. Includes AI content creation and nonconsensual intimate imagery safeguards (1.2), creative assets (2.3.14), hidden features (2.5.19), revised purchase-link entitlements (3.1.1(a)), and alternative-distribution enforcement (5). Also covers social media age-rating questions, Republic of Korea age rating changes, and Brazil/EU alternative payment and distribution terms.
When to Apply
Use this skill when:
- Preparing an app for App Store submission
- Reviewing code for compliance issues
- Implementing features that may trigger review concerns
- Auditing existing apps for guideline violations
- Building features involving payments, user data, or sensitive content
Guideline Sections
Read individual rule files for detailed explanations, checklists, and code examples:
| Section | File | Key Topics |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Safety | rules/1-safety.md | Objectionable content, UGC and AI content safeguards, Kids Category, physical harm, data security |
| 2. Performance | rules/2-performance.md | App completeness, metadata and creative assets, hardware compatibility, software requirements, hidden features |
| 3. Business | rules/3-business.md | In-app purchase, subscriptions, cryptocurrencies, other business models |
| 4. Design | rules/4-design.md | Copycats, minimum functionality, spam, extensions, Apple services, login |
| 5. Legal | rules/5-legal.md | Privacy, data collection, intellectual property, gambling, VPN, MDM, developer code of conduct |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +11 lines 6499f09f671c
- 14d ago Changed · +11 lines 0bfd69909ef3
- 21d ago Changed · +4 lines 761747f3f249
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines 6ac4e1662ee5
- 1mo ago Changed ff7cd05d0ad3
- 1mo ago First seen · 244 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 956c7a200757
app-store-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill (400 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 3,902 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
play-policy-insights
Automated auditor designed to verify Android applications against Google Play Policy domains. It cross-references static code analysis with Play Store declarations to generate deterministic compliance reports, identifying undeclared data collection, architectural risks, and missing disclosures across Permissions and…
appstore-review-checker
Audit iOS/macOS apps against App Store Review Guidelines before submission, with evidence-backed verdicts and fixes. Don't use for Google Play, general code review, or rejection appeals.
app-store-preflight-compliance
Pre-submission compliance scanner workflow for Apple App Store apps. Use when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS projects (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, Expo) for App Store rejection risks, submission readiness, privacy compliance, or guideline violations.
gplay-submission-checks
Pre-submission validation for Google Play releases covering metadata, screenshots, bundle integrity, data safety, and policy compliance. Use when preparing a release to avoid rejections and catch issues before submitting.
privacy-policy
Generate privacy policies, terms of service, and EULAs for Apple platform apps. Detects data collection patterns, third-party SDKs, and generates region-specific legal documents with Apple Privacy Nutrition Label mapping. Use when user needs legal documents or data collection disclosure for App Store submission.
capacitor-apple-review-preflight
Audits a Capacitor iOS app against Apple App Review Guidelines before submission or after a rejection. Use when the user pastes a rejection (Guideline 4.2 Minimum Functionality, 4.8 Login Services / Sign in with Apple, 5.1.1 data collection or account deletion, 5.1.2(i) sharing data with third-party AI, 3.1.1 in-app…