Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sairam0424/MindForge --skill github-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sairam0424/MindForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/github-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/github-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/github-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/github-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/github-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.03612 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.01445 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00722 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00361 |
Grade C, and why
github-code-review scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reaches for credential fileshighPrivilege escalation
SSH keys, cloud credentials, git-credentials, .npmrc, /etc/shadow: reading these is how a config file becomes a credential leak.
elif grep -q "github.com" ~/.git-credentials 2>/dev/null; then Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
Perform code reviews on local changes before pushing, or review open PRs on GitHub. Most of this skill uses plain `git` — the `gh`/`curl` split only matters for PR-level interactions. This is a copy
86% identical to github-code-review — 31 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 475 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub Code Review
Perform code reviews on local changes before pushing, or review open PRs on GitHub. Most of this skill uses plain git — the gh/curl split only matters for PR-level interactions.
Prerequisites
- Authenticated with GitHub (see
github-authskill) - Inside a git repository
Setup (for PR interactions)
if command -v gh &>/dev/null && gh auth status &>/dev/null; then
AUTH="gh"
else
AUTH="git"
if [ -z "$GITHUB_TOKEN" ]; then
if _agent_env="${AGENT_HOME:-$HOME/.agent}/.env"; [ -f "$_agent_env" ] && grep -q "^GITHUB_TOKEN=" "$_agent_env"; then
GITHUB_TOKEN=$(grep "^GITHUB_TOKEN=" "$_agent_env" | head -1 | cut -d= -f2 | tr -d '\n\r')
elif grep -q "github.com" ~/.git-credentials 2>/dev/null; then
GITHUB_TOKEN=$(grep "github.com" ~/.git-credentials 2>/dev/null | head -1 | sed 's|https://[^:]*:\([^@]*\)@.*|\1|')
fi
fi
fi
REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin)
OWNER_REPO=$(echo "$REMOTE_URL" | sed -E 's|.*github\.com[:/]||; s|\.git$||')
OWNER=$(echo "$OWNER_REPO" | cut -d/ -f1)
REPO=$(echo "$OWNER_REPO" | cut -d/ -f2)
1. Reviewing Local Changes (Pre-Push)
This is pure git — works everywhere, no API needed.
Get the Diff
# Staged changes (what would be committed)
git diff --staged
# All changes vs main (what a PR would contain)
git diff main...HEAD
# File names only
git diff main...HEAD --name-only
# Stat summary (insertions/deletions per file)
git diff main...HEAD --stat
Review Strategy
- Get the big picture first:
git diff main...HEAD --stat
git log main..HEAD --oneline
- Review file by file — use
Readon changed files for full context, and the diff to see what changed:
git diff main...HEAD -- src/auth/login.py
- Check for common issues:
# Debug statements, TODOs, console.logs left behind
git diff main...HEAD | grep -n "print(\|console\.log\|TODO\|FIXME\|HACK\|XXX\|debugger"
# Large files accidentally staged
git diff main...HEAD --stat | sort -t'|' -k2 -rn | head -10
# Secrets or credential patterns
git diff main...HEAD | grep -in "password\|secret\|api_key\|token.*=\|private_key"
# Merge conflict markers
git diff main...HEAD | grep -n "<<<<<<\|>>>>>>\|======="
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 475 lines · 18 tokens per session scan C ed12f70f9b92
github-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository sairam0424/MindForge (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 3,612 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (reaches for credential files, makes network calls). It is 86% identical to github-code-review, differing in 31 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
address-github-comments
Use when you need to address review or issue comments on an open GitHub Pull Request using the gh CLI.
git-pr-workflows-git-workflow
Guide changes through code checks, testing, commits, and pull request preparation. Use when coordinating a complete Git workflow and verifying readiness for collaboration.
dev-pr
AI DevKit · Publish a ready feature branch for review. Use when the user wants to sync, push, and open or update a code review request on GitHub, GitLab, or another Git host.
git-pr-workflows-pr-enhance
Improve pull request descriptions, change summaries, validation details, and review workflows. Use when preparing a pull request or making an existing proposal easier to evaluate.
openclaw-github-dedupe
Investigate a cluster of GitHub issues and PRs, determine canonical candidates, post duplicate/related status, preserve contributor credit, and execute cleanup actions. Supports autonomous mode for provided-link-only closeout, merge/fix follow-through, changelog, and post-merge issue/PR cleanup.
openclaw-pr-batch-sweep
Select, review, repair, validate, and land batches of up to 20 low-risk OpenClaw contributor pull requests using Vincent's maintainer preferences and bounded sub-agent lanes. Use for "next 20", broad contributor PR sweeps, merge-candidate mining, or continued PR-batch work where drafts, maintainer work, trivial…