Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sairam0424/mindforge/mindforge-execute-phasenpx skills add sairam0424/MindForge --skill mindforge-execute-phasegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sairam0424/MindForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/mindforge-execute-phase)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/mindforge-execute-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/mindforge-execute-phase.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00563 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00282 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
mindforge-execute-phase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to gsd-execute-phase — 25 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Orchestrator stays lean: discover plans, analyze dependencies, group into waves, spawn subagents, collect results. Each subagent loads the full execute-plan context and handles its own plan.
Optional wave filter:
--wave Nexecutes only WaveNfor pacing, quota management, or staged rollout- phase verification/completion still only happens when no incomplete plans remain after the selected wave finishes
Flag handling rule:
- The optional flags documented below are available behaviors, not implied active behaviors
- A flag is active only when its literal token appears in
$ARGUMENTS - If a documented flag is absent from
$ARGUMENTS, treat it as inactive
Context budget: ~15% orchestrator, 100% fresh per subagent.
<execution_context> @.agent/workflows/mindforge-execute-phase.md @docs/References/ui-brand.md </execution_context>
Available optional flags (documentation only — not automatically active):
--wave N— Execute only WaveNin the phase. Use when you want to pace execution or stay inside usage limits.--gaps-only— Execute only gap closure plans (plans withgap_closure: truein frontmatter). Use after verify-work creates fix plans.--interactive— Execute plans sequentially inline (no subagents) with user checkpoints between tasks. Lower token usage, pair-programming style. Best for small phases, bug fixes, and verification gaps.
Active flags must be derived from $ARGUMENTS:
--wave Nis active only if the literal--wavetoken is present in$ARGUMENTS--gaps-onlyis active only if the literal--gaps-onlytoken is present in$ARGUMENTS--interactiveis active only if the literal--interactivetoken is present in$ARGUMENTS- If none of these tokens appear, run the standard full-phase execution flow with no flag-specific filtering
- Do not infer that a flag is active just because it is documented in this prompt
Context files are resolved inside the workflow via mindforge-tools init execute-phase and per-subagent <files_to_read> blocks.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 50 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 4ea1db9ae910
mindforge-execute-phase is a skill published in the GitHub repository sairam0424/MindForge (0 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 563 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to gsd-execute-phase, differing in 25 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cao-workflow
Author and run CAO Python workflow scripts — multi-step, parameterized, fan-out orchestrations executed by cao workflow run. Use when the user wants a repeatable multi-step job (e.g. data analysis over many files, a review pipeline, a parameterized batch). Authoring ends at a validated script file; running it is a…
aidlc-portfolio
Coordinate multiple AI-DLC workflows across repositories and Git worktrees using an evidence-backed portfolio catalog and deterministic workspace tooling. Use when initializing an AI-DLC portfolio workspace, discovering organization or business context, registering projects and dependencies, creating child intents and…
cao-mcp-apps
Enable, operate, and extend CAO's MCP Apps surface — the host-rendered fleet dashboard visible inside MCP App hosts (Claude Desktop, ChatGPT, VS Code Copilot, Goose, Postman). Use when the user says "enable MCP Apps in CAO", "the ui://cao views aren't rendering", "rebuild MCP Apps bundles", "add a new ui://cao/ view"…
cao-provider
Create a new CLI agent provider for CAO (CLI Agent Orchestrator). Use this skill whenever the user wants to add support for a new CLI-based AI agent (e.g., a new coding assistant CLI), integrate a new provider, or scaffold a provider implementation. Also use when the user asks about the provider architecture, what…
cao-worker-protocols
Worker-side callback and completion rules for assigned and handed-off tasks in CAO.
ap-depth-prober
L4 terminal leaf - G3.5 DEPTH-LOCK. Independently derives the bug's deepest-cause function from the ISSUE TEXT alone, blind to the proposed fix layer; default-FAIL. Emits D1-D5. depth-miss REJECTs to G1.