Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sairam0424/MindForge. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sairam0424/MindForge/main/.agent/skills/mindforge-validate-phase/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sairam0424/MindForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/mindforge-validate-phase)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/mindforge-validate-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/mindforge-validate-phase/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/mindforge-validate-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sairam0424/mindforge/mindforge-validate-phase.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00168 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00067 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
mindforge-validate-phase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to gsd-validate-phase — 19 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Output: updated VALIDATION.md + generated test files.
<execution_context> @.agent/workflows/mindforge-validate-phase.md </execution_context>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 1c1c1ef8ef06
mindforge-validate-phase is a skill published in the GitHub repository sairam0424/MindForge (0 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 168 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to gsd-validate-phase, differing in 19 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality. Use when asked to add tests to a function, fix a bug…
agent-harness-fault-injection
Use when an agent workflow needs deterministic recovery evidence for sandbox, MCP/tool, worker, checkpoint, memory, or orchestration failures.
agent-orchestration-improve-agent
Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.
agent-qa-result-triage
Triage failed Agent QA runs with MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, fixed failure categories, confidence, and actionable next steps.
android_ui_verification
Automated end-to-end UI testing and verification on an Android Emulator using ADB.
agent-evals
Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.