Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add saisudhir14/claude-skills --skill go-performancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saisudhir14/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-performance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-performance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-performance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00798 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00319 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
go-performance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Performance
Performance optimization patterns for production Go.
Prefer strconv Over fmt
strconv is faster for primitive conversions.
// Slower
s := fmt.Sprintf("%d", n)
// Faster
s := strconv.Itoa(n)
Avoid Repeated String to Byte Conversions
// Wrong: converts on every iteration
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
w.Write([]byte("hello"))
}
// Correct
data := []byte("hello")
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
w.Write(data)
}
Specify Map Capacity
// Wrong
m := make(map[string]int)
// Correct when size is known
m := make(map[string]int, len(items))
Preallocate Slice Capacity
// Wrong
var result []Item
for _, v := range input {
result = append(result, transform(v))
}
// Correct
result := make([]Item, 0, len(input))
for _, v := range input {
result = append(result, transform(v))
}
Use strings.Builder for Concatenation
// Wrong: creates many allocations
var s string
for _, part := range parts {
s += part
}
// Correct
var b strings.Builder
b.Grow(totalLen) // optional: preallocate
for _, part := range parts {
b.WriteString(part)
}
s := b.String()
Container-Aware GOMAXPROCS (Go 1.25+)
Go 1.25 automatically adjusts GOMAXPROCS based on container CPU limits.
// On Linux with cgroups, GOMAXPROCS now considers:
// - CPU bandwidth limits (CPU limit in Kubernetes)
// - Changes dynamically if limits change
// Automatic behavior is disabled if you set GOMAXPROCS explicitly:
// - Via GOMAXPROCS environment variable
// - Via runtime.GOMAXPROCS() call
This means Go programs in containers perform better out-of-the-box without manual GOMAXPROCS tuning.
Resource Management (Go 1.24+)
runtime.AddCleanup
Prefer runtime.AddCleanup over runtime.SetFinalizer for cleanup operations.
func NewResource() *Resource {
r := &Resource{handle: allocHandle()}
runtime.AddCleanup(r, func(handle uintptr) {
freeHandle(handle)
}, r.handle)
return r
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 155 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 93862efeda3d
go-performance is a skill published in the GitHub repository saisudhir14/claude-skills (8 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 798 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
go-performance compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| go-performancesaisudhir14/claude-skills | Skill | 8 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |
| golang-testingaffaan-m/ECC | Skill | 298k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| golang-patternsaffaan-m/ECC | Skill | 298k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 45 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| golang-testingsamber/cc-skills-golang | Skill | 3.8k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code |
| golang-uber-fxsamber/cc-skills-golang | Skill | 3.8k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 122 | Claude Code |
| golang-samber-oopssamber/cc-skills-golang | Skill | 3.8k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 74 | Claude Code |
| ax-go-agent-optimizeax-llm/ax | Skill | 3.0k | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 51 | Claude Code, Codex |