Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add saisudhir14/claude-skills --skill go-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saisudhir14/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01329 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00665 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
go-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 207 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Testing
Production-grade testing patterns for Go.
Table-Driven Tests with Parallel Execution
func TestSplit(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
input string
sep string
want []string
}{
{name: "simple", input: "a/b/c", sep: "/", want: []string{"a", "b", "c"}},
{name: "empty", input: "", sep: "/", want: []string{""}},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
got := strings.Split(tt.input, tt.sep)
if diff := cmp.Diff(tt.want, got); diff != "" {
t.Errorf("Split() mismatch (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
}
})
}
}
T.Context and T.Chdir (Go 1.24+)
func TestWithContext(t *testing.T) {
// T.Context returns a context canceled after test completes
// but before cleanup functions run
ctx := t.Context()
result, err := doWork(ctx)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
}
func TestWithChdir(t *testing.T) {
// T.Chdir changes working directory for duration of test
// and automatically restores it after
t.Chdir("testdata")
data, err := os.ReadFile("input.txt")
// ...
}
Benchmark with b.Loop (Go 1.24+)
// Old way - error prone
func BenchmarkOld(b *testing.B) {
input := setupInput() // counted in benchmark time!
b.ResetTimer()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
process(input) // compiler might optimize away
}
}
// Go 1.24+ - preferred
func BenchmarkNew(b *testing.B) {
input := setupInput() // setup runs once, excluded from timing
for b.Loop() {
process(input) // compiler cannot optimize away
}
}
Benefits of b.Loop():
- Setup code runs exactly once per
-count, automatically excluded from timing - No need to call
b.ResetTimer() - Function call parameters and results are kept alive, preventing compiler optimization
Testing Concurrent Code with synctest (Go 1.25+)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 207 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 0aa85d70ddd2
go-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository saisudhir14/claude-skills (8 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,329 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
golang-testing
Go testing best practices including table-driven tests, test helpers, benchmarking, race detection, coverage analysis, and integration testing patterns. Use when writing or improving Go tests.
setup
Wire Ginkgo into a Go package — install the ginkgo CLI and Ginkgo+Gomega, ginkgo bootstrap to generate the suitetest.go (TestXxx/RegisterFailHandler(Fail)/RunSpecs), the package xxxtest convention, dot-import alternatives (aliased import, dsl/ subpackages, --nodot), ginkgo generate, and testing.T interop via…
timeouts-and-async
Make Ginkgo specs interruptible and test asynchronous behavior — SpecContext/context.Context cancellable nodes, NodeTimeout/SpecTimeout/GracePeriod, the --timeout flag, Abort and SIGINT behavior, Gomega Eventually/Consistently (the func(g Gomega) form, .WithContext), and the defer GinkgoRecover() rule for goroutines.…
golang-testing
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI…
overview
The Ginkgo mental model for writing Go tests — the one idea that explains everything (Ginkgo builds a spec tree at construction time, then runs it) and its consequences for how you write specs, plus spec independence and the node taxonomy. Use this first when you start working with Ginkgo in a project, or to decide…
golang-stretchr-testify
Comprehensive guide to stretchr/testify for Golang testing. Covers assert, require, mock, and suite packages in depth. Use when writing tests with testify, creating mocks, setting up test suites, or choosing between assert and require. Covers testify assertions, mock expectations, argument matchers, call verification…