Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add saisudhir14/claude-skills --skill go-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saisudhir14/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saisudhir14/claude-skills/go-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01329 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00532 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
go-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 207 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Testing
Production-grade testing patterns for Go.
Table-Driven Tests with Parallel Execution
func TestSplit(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
input string
sep string
want []string
}{
{name: "simple", input: "a/b/c", sep: "/", want: []string{"a", "b", "c"}},
{name: "empty", input: "", sep: "/", want: []string{""}},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
got := strings.Split(tt.input, tt.sep)
if diff := cmp.Diff(tt.want, got); diff != "" {
t.Errorf("Split() mismatch (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
}
})
}
}
T.Context and T.Chdir (Go 1.24+)
func TestWithContext(t *testing.T) {
// T.Context returns a context canceled after test completes
// but before cleanup functions run
ctx := t.Context()
result, err := doWork(ctx)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
}
func TestWithChdir(t *testing.T) {
// T.Chdir changes working directory for duration of test
// and automatically restores it after
t.Chdir("testdata")
data, err := os.ReadFile("input.txt")
// ...
}
Benchmark with b.Loop (Go 1.24+)
// Old way - error prone
func BenchmarkOld(b *testing.B) {
input := setupInput() // counted in benchmark time!
b.ResetTimer()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
process(input) // compiler might optimize away
}
}
// Go 1.24+ - preferred
func BenchmarkNew(b *testing.B) {
input := setupInput() // setup runs once, excluded from timing
for b.Loop() {
process(input) // compiler cannot optimize away
}
}
Benefits of b.Loop():
- Setup code runs exactly once per
-count, automatically excluded from timing - No need to call
b.ResetTimer() - Function call parameters and results are kept alive, preventing compiler optimization
Testing Concurrent Code with synctest (Go 1.25+)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 207 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 0aa85d70ddd2
go-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository saisudhir14/claude-skills (8 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,329 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
go-testing compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| go-testingsaisudhir14/claude-skills | Skill | 8 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code, Codex |
| golang-testingaffaan-m/ECC | Skill | 298k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| setuponsi/ginkgo | Skill | 9.1k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 118 | Claude Code |
| timeouts-and-asynconsi/ginkgo | Skill | 9.1k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 106 | Claude Code |
| golang-testingsamber/cc-skills-golang | Skill | 3.8k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code |
| golang-stretchr-testifysamber/cc-skills-golang | Skill | 3.8k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 97 | Claude Code |
| overviewonsi/ginkgo | Skill | 9.1k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |