Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add saitarrun/Devforge-ai --skill to-issuesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saitarrun/Devforge-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saitarrun/devforge-ai/to-issues)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saitarrun/devforge-ai/to-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saitarrun/devforge-ai/to-issues.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00707 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00353 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
to-issues scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to to-issues — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
To Issues
Break a plan into independently-grabbable issues using vertical slices (tracer bullets).
The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you.
Process
1. Gather context
Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes an issue reference (issue number, URL, or path) as an argument, fetch it from the issue tracker and read its full body and comments.
2. Explore the codebase (optional)
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Issue titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."
3. Draft vertical slices
Break the plan into tracer bullet issues. Each issue is a thin vertical slice that cuts through ALL integration layers end-to-end, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer.
- Each slice delivers a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests)
- A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
- Any prefactoring should be done first
4. Quiz the user
Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each slice, show:
- Title: short descriptive name
- Blocked by: which other slices (if any) must complete first
- User stories covered: which user stories this addresses (if the source material has them)
Ask the user:
- Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
- Are the dependency relationships correct?
- Should any slices be merged or split further?
Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
5. Publish the issues to the issue tracker
For each approved slice, publish a new issue to the issue tracker. Use the issue body template below. These issues are considered ready for AFK agents, so publish them with the correct triage label unless instructed otherwise.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 85 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A f97d799191f7
to-issues is a skill published in the GitHub repository saitarrun/Devforge-ai (5 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 707 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to to-issues, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
batch
Dispatch a night's batch of Todo tickets — one worktree and one pull request each — and leave a morning summary. Run explicitly; never inferred.
prep
Spec a ticket before it is dispatched. Brainstorms it, decides everything it can recommend an answer for, asks a present human about the little that survives, and leaves the spec, the decisions and anything still open as one ticket comment. No worktree, no branch, no pull request, and the ticket stays where it was.
work
Dispatch a tracker ticket into an isolated worktree and drive it autonomously to an open pull request, then stop for review. Pass interactive to brainstorm the ticket with a human before planning it. Use when asked to work a ticket end-to-end.
g-init
The single G-Forge front door — run once after installing the plugin. Detects what's here and routes to /g-onboard (existing codebase) or /g-kickoff (new project) for the brief, scaffolds CLAUDE.md (compact G-rules), g-docs/ROADMAP.md (with the Active Session handoff), g-docs/milestones/, g-docs/todo.md, the…
g-onboard
Onboard G-Forge onto an existing codebase. Reads deeply before asking anything — treats existing CLAUDE.md, rules, agents, and task ledgers as first-class inputs. Only interviews for what it genuinely doesn't know yet. Produces or updates g-docs/projectbrief.md.
g-roadmap
Project-manager-driven milestone planner. Gated phases — feature dump → cluster → sequence → premortem & re-prioritize → approve → write. Narrates reasoning at every step, and runs a premortem + re-prioritization of the whole roadmap whenever a milestone is added or modified. Auto-triggers when no g-docs/ROADMAP.md…