Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add saitarrun/Devforge-ai --skill to-issuesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saitarrun/Devforge-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saitarrun/devforge-ai/to-issues)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saitarrun/devforge-ai/to-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saitarrun/devforge-ai/to-issues/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saitarrun/devforge-ai/to-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saitarrun/devforge-ai/to-issues.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00707 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
to-issues scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to to-issues — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
To Issues
Break a plan into independently-grabbable issues using vertical slices (tracer bullets).
The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you.
Process
1. Gather context
Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes an issue reference (issue number, URL, or path) as an argument, fetch it from the issue tracker and read its full body and comments.
2. Explore the codebase (optional)
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Issue titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."
3. Draft vertical slices
Break the plan into tracer bullet issues. Each issue is a thin vertical slice that cuts through ALL integration layers end-to-end, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer.
- Each slice delivers a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests)
- A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
- Any prefactoring should be done first
4. Quiz the user
Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each slice, show:
- Title: short descriptive name
- Blocked by: which other slices (if any) must complete first
- User stories covered: which user stories this addresses (if the source material has them)
Ask the user:
- Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
- Are the dependency relationships correct?
- Should any slices be merged or split further?
Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
5. Publish the issues to the issue tracker
For each approved slice, publish a new issue to the issue tracker. Use the issue body template below. These issues are considered ready for AFK agents, so publish them with the correct triage label unless instructed otherwise.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 85 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A f97d799191f7
to-issues is a skill published in the GitHub repository saitarrun/Devforge-ai (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 707 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to to-issues, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
merge-review
Reviews pending fleet worktree merges before they're accepted. Reads the merge-check queue, detects file-level conflicts between branches, proposes a safe merge order, and surfaces reconciliation plans for overlapping changes.
workspace
Multi-repo campaign coordinator. Same lifecycle as fleet -- scope claims, discovery relay, wave-based execution -- but the unit of work is a repo, not a file. Coordinates campaigns across repositories with shared context.
decision-map
Turn a loose idea into a git-tracked, session-resumable map of typed investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time. The planning-loop engine for work that is still being figured out — too fuzzy for a campaign, too big for a single intake item. Resolved tickets graduate into .planning/intake/ for…
unharness
Safely leave Citadel using the active adoption receipt. Produces a no-write, reviewable plan, preserves a portable archive, removes only exact owned material, and reports modified or externally registered surfaces as retained or unknown. Legacy installs must be imported before exact leave is claimed.
agy-lead
Orchestrate an ongoing task with AGY while the current agent owns key decisions, review, and delivery. Use when the user invokes /agy-lead or asks you to coordinate a task using AGY.
pave-catalog
Build a service catalog — schema, starter entries, and governance model. Produces what information to capture per service, how it's maintained, and where it lives. Use when asked to "service catalog", "what services do we have", "catalog our services", "service inventory", or "who owns what".