Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-plugin/git-workflownpx skills add salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-plugin --skill git-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-pluginWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00558 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
git-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Workflow Patterns
Overview
Ensures consistent Git practices across all agent workflows, favoring isolated work environments (worktrees) and clean lifecycle closure.
Branch Setup
Option A: Standard Branching
Use for quick, single-task fixes where isolated environments are not required.
git checkout main && git pull origin main
git checkout -b feature/{feature-name}
Option B: Isolated Worktree (RECOMMENDED)
Use for complex features or PR reviews to keep the main workspace clean.
# Use automated script for features
./scripts/worktree-feature.sh {feature-name}
cd ../.worktrees/feature-{feature-name}
# OR for PR reviews
./scripts/worktree-review.sh {pr-number}
cd ../.worktrees/pr-{pr-number}
Why worktrees?
- Parallel work without stashing.
- Isolated dependencies.
- No interruption of main branch state.
Branch Lifecycle Closure (MANDATORY)
[!CAUTION] BLOCKING STEP. Never proceed to task completion with an open, unmerged feature branch unless explicitly documented.
Option A: Work Merged via PR (Recommended)
If the PR was merged via GitHub:
# Switch to main and clean up
git checkout main
git pull origin main
git branch -d feature/{name} # Delete local
Option B: Local-Only Work (Direct Merge)
If work was small and doesn't need a PR:
# Merge locally and clean up
git checkout main
git merge feature/{name} --no-ff -m "merge: {feature}"
git branch -d feature/{name} # Delete local
git push origin main
Option C: Abandon Work
git checkout main
git branch -D feature/{name} # Force delete local
git push origin --delete feature/{name} # Delete remote (if exists)
Option D: Keep WIP (Escape Hatch)
If the branch must stay open (e.g., waiting for review):
export SKIP_BRANCH_CHECK=1
git push
Option E: Worktree Cleanup
# From main workspace
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/{name}
./scripts/worktree-cleanup.sh # Prune metadata
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 88 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A a2d396b9d418
git-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-plugin (47 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 558 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…