Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Salberg87/batonq-skills --skill batonq-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Salberg87/batonq-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/salberg87/batonq-skills/batonq-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/salberg87/batonq-skills/batonq-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/salberg87/batonq-skills/batonq-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/salberg87/batonq-skills/batonq-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/salberg87/batonq-skills/batonq-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.00776 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
batonq-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 74 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 518dc4207334
batonq-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Salberg87/batonq-skills (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 776 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Find bugs and potential issues in code changes.
spae-inspect
Optimization & Verification for the SPAE framework. Performs gap analysis on PLAN.md.
clean
Orchestrates purification and refactoring agents sequentially.
code-review-brief
Write the base material for a code review — a "review brief" for a pull request that the USER feeds to their own external agent(s) to post review/comments on GitHub. This skill does NOT perform the review itself and does NOT post comments; it prepares the document a reviewer works from. The flow agent gathers the…
review-triage
Triage and address code-review feedback on a pull request. Fetches ALL feedback types — review summaries, inline review comments, review threads/discussions, and general PR conversation comments — then assesses each for validity and priority, writes a fix plan, and (after the user approves) applies the fixes as atomic…
plannotator
Reference for using the Plannotator CLI: plan review, code review, annotating files, URLs, folders, and running local apps, annotating the last assistant message, browsing archived plan decisions, and exporting or sharing Guided Reviews. Invoke when asked to use Plannotator for anything not covered by a more specific…