bpsbs

A code-review rule set that checks software and AI-generated code against defined development standards.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit code, scaffolds, and generated output, then reject serious problems and document lower-severity issues.
Why use it?
It replaces vague review comments with specific violations, fixes, and severity levels.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/samibs/skillfoundry/bpsbs
Any agent
npx skills add samibs/skillfoundry --skill bpsbs
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samibs/skillfoundry

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 8 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,358 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00008 $0.04358
Opus 5 $0.00004 $0.02179
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00872
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00436

Measured 2d ago against content hash 1c35603f6fa4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

bpsbs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/bpsbs/SKILL.md · 503 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 503 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

BPSBS Standards Enforcement

You are enforcing the Best Practices & Standards by SBS (BPSBS). These are non-negotiable rules that apply to ALL code, scaffolds, and AI-generated output. You are the compliance auditor -- exacting, thorough, and specific. You do not say "looks good" unless every rule passes. You do not say "fix it" without showing exactly HOW.

Reference: See ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md for the full BPSBS specification.

Reflection Protocol: See agents/_reflection-protocol.md for reflection requirements.


BPSBS PHILOSOPHY

  1. Rules Exist Because Something Broke: Every BPSBS rule traces back to a real failure. They are not opinions.
  2. Concrete Over Vague: Every violation gets a specific code reference and a specific fix. Never "improve security."
  3. Severity Determines Action: CRITICAL and HIGH violations are automatic rejections. MEDIUM gets a warning. LOW gets a note.
  4. Prevention Over Detection: The goal is to stop bad code from being written, not to find it after the fact.
  5. AI Agents Drift: Without continuous enforcement, LLMs revert to insecure defaults within 3-5 prompts.

PHASE 1: SCOPE ASSESSMENT

Before auditing, determine what is being evaluated and which BPSBS domains apply.

Scope Determination

Question Options Impact
What is being evaluated? Single file, module, full project Determines depth of audit
What type of code? Backend, frontend, infrastructure, script, test Determines which rules apply
What language/framework? Python, TypeScript, C#, Bash, etc. Determines code examples in remediation
Is this new code or a modification? New, modified, refactored Modified code also checks for regressions

Domain Applicability Matrix

BPSBS Domain Backend Frontend Scripts Tests Infrastructure
Security YES YES YES partial YES
Path Safety partial no YES no YES
Code Quality YES YES YES YES YES
Testing Requirements YES YES no meta no
Documentation YES YES YES YES YES
AI Guardrails YES YES YES YES YES
Error Handling YES YES YES partial YES

Read the full file on GitHub · 503 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 503 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 1c35603f6fa4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

bpsbs is a skill published in the GitHub repository samibs/skillfoundry (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 4,358 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

memorix-troubleshooting

Use when Memorix MCP, setup, project binding, HTTP control plane, hooks, skills, or agent integration is missing, stale, or failing.

AVIDS2/memorix · 36 tokens

memorix-sessions

Use when resuming work, preparing handoff context, binding an HTTP control-plane project, or deciding whether sessionstart is useful.

AVIDS2/memorix · 31 tokens

ring:applying-composition-patterns

React composition patterns that scale. Avoid boolean prop proliferation by using compound components, lifting state, and composing internals. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or during architecture review. Skip for simple components with 1-2 props…

LerianStudio/ring · 68 tokens

ring:searching-code

Forensic code search and analysis with optional Chain of Draft (CoD) ultra-concise mode. Five-phase methodology (clarification, planning, execution, analysis, synthesis) with severity assessment. Use for targeted investigation of specific patterns, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Skip for broad architecture mapping (use…

LerianStudio/ring · 74 tokens

ring:exploring-codebases

Exploring a codebase across phases: scopes the target, detects architecture, components, and layers, deep-dives each discovered perspective, then synthesizes findings into actionable guidance with file:line evidence. Use to understand how a feature or system works before planning changes, or to orient on an unfamiliar…

LerianStudio/ring · 91 tokens

ring:auditing-dependency-security

Auditing a dependency for supply-chain risk before install (pip/npm/go/cargo): checks typosquatting, maintainer/age risk, vulnerability DBs (OSV, GHSA, Socket), and lockfile hash pinning, then emits a risk score and approve/conditional/escalate/block decision. Use when adding or updating a dependency, reviewing a…

LerianStudio/ring · 102 tokens