certify

A project-audit command that scans a codebase across 15 categories and assigns a grade from A to F. It can also check one category or create an HTML report.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit a Node.js, Python, .NET, Go, or Rust project, review one area such as security, or generate an HTML audit report.
Why use it?
It helps reveal security and other project issues in a consistent report instead of relying only on manual review.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/samibs/skillfoundry/certify
Any agent
npx skills add samibs/skillfoundry --skill certify
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samibs/skillfoundry

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 11 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,915 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00011 $0.01915
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00958
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00383
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00192

Measured 2d ago against content hash ef3c17e3daaf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

certify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/certify/SKILL.md · 221 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/certify - RegForge Certification Pipeline

Run a full 15-category audit on the current project and produce a certification grade (A-F).


Usage

/certify                          Full certification (all 15 categories)
/certify --category security      Single category only
/certify --html report.html       Also generate HTML report

Instructions

You are the RegForge Certification Engine — a static analysis auditor that evaluates projects across 15 categories and produces a pass/fail grade. When /certify is invoked, execute the full audit pipeline below.

PHASE 1: PROJECT SCAN

Identify the project type by checking for:

  • package.json → Node.js/TypeScript
  • requirements.txt / pyproject.toml → Python
  • *.csproj / *.sln → .NET
  • go.mod → Go
  • Cargo.toml → Rust

List all files in the project root and key directories (src/, lib/, app/, tests/).

PHASE 2: RUN ALL 11 AUDIT CATEGORIES

For each category, scan the project and score 0-100. Deduct points per finding:

  • Critical: -20 points
  • High: -15 points
  • Medium: -10 points
  • Low: -5 points
  • Info: -2 points
Category 1: SECURITY (Weight: 15%)

Scan all source files for:

  • Hardcoded secrets (API_KEY, SECRET, TOKEN, PASSWORD with values)
  • eval() usage
  • innerHTML assignment (XSS risk)
  • dangerouslySetInnerHTML
  • SQL string concatenation
  • exec() with string arguments
  • Missing .gitignore
  • Secrets in .env files tracked by git
Category 2: DOCUMENTATION (Weight: 10%)

Check for:

  • README.md exists and has >50 chars
  • CHANGELOG.md exists
  • LICENSE file exists
  • docs/ directory exists
  • JSDoc/docstring coverage on public functions
Category 3: TESTING (Weight: 15%)

Check for:

  • Test files exist (.test., .spec., _test.)
  • Test-to-source file ratio (aim for 1:3 minimum)
  • Test framework config (jest.config, vitest.config, pytest.ini, etc.)
  • Coverage report files
Category 4: DEPENDENCIES (Weight: 10%)

Check for:

  • Dependency manifest exists (package.json, requirements.txt)
  • Lockfile exists (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, etc.)
  • No wildcard "*" versions
  • devDependencies separate from dependencies

Read the full file on GitHub · 221 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 221 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A ef3c17e3daaf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

certify is a skill published in the GitHub repository samibs/skillfoundry (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 1,915 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

memorix-troubleshooting

Use when Memorix MCP, setup, project binding, HTTP control plane, hooks, skills, or agent integration is missing, stale, or failing.

AVIDS2/memorix · 36 tokens

memorix-sessions

Use when resuming work, preparing handoff context, binding an HTTP control-plane project, or deciding whether sessionstart is useful.

AVIDS2/memorix · 31 tokens

ring:applying-composition-patterns

React composition patterns that scale. Avoid boolean prop proliferation by using compound components, lifting state, and composing internals. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or during architecture review. Skip for simple components with 1-2 props…

LerianStudio/ring · 68 tokens

ring:searching-code

Forensic code search and analysis with optional Chain of Draft (CoD) ultra-concise mode. Five-phase methodology (clarification, planning, execution, analysis, synthesis) with severity assessment. Use for targeted investigation of specific patterns, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Skip for broad architecture mapping (use…

LerianStudio/ring · 74 tokens

ring:exploring-codebases

Exploring a codebase across phases: scopes the target, detects architecture, components, and layers, deep-dives each discovered perspective, then synthesizes findings into actionable guidance with file:line evidence. Use to understand how a feature or system works before planning changes, or to orient on an unfamiliar…

LerianStudio/ring · 91 tokens

ring:auditing-dependency-security

Auditing a dependency for supply-chain risk before install (pip/npm/go/cargo): checks typosquatting, maintainer/age risk, vulnerability DBs (OSV, GHSA, Socket), and lockfile hash pinning, then emits a risk score and approve/conditional/escalate/block decision. Use when adding or updating a dependency, reviewing a…

LerianStudio/ring · 102 tokens