What is code-quality-review?

A code-review guide for TypeScript projects that checks implementation quality, documentation, tests, and changes to public interfaces.

Use it when reviewing changes, checking lint or typecheck issues, and validating that code, tests, documentation, and CLI or MCP interfaces stay aligned.

It helps catch type errors, missing tests, outdated documentation, unsafe changes, and incorrect dependencies before they cause problems.

code-quality-review — Skill for Claude Code and Codex by samilozturk: A code-review guide for TypeScript projects that checks implementation

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods

npx agentmods add skills/samilozturk/agentlint/code-quality-review

Any agent

npx skills add samilozturk/agentlint --skill code-quality-review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samilozturk/agentlint

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samilozturk/agentlint/code-quality-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/samilozturk/agentlint/code-quality-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samilozturk/agentlint/code-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samilozturk/agentlint/code-quality-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Per session 64 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 677 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00064	$0.00677
Opus 5	$0.00032	$0.00338
Sonnet 5	$0.00013	$0.00135
Haiku 4.5	$0.00006	$0.00068

Measured 5d ago against content hash 6303ec833891, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-05, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-quality-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/code-quality-review/SKILL.md · 102 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Skill: Code Quality Review

When to Use

Use this skill when:

reviewing a PR or local diff in this repo
checking strict TypeScript and lint compliance
validating docs/tests/context alignment for public surface changes
looking for risky regressions in CLI, MCP, core, or shared packages

Purpose

Apply Agent Lint's repository-specific review standards so changes stay type-safe, testable, documented, and aligned with public behavior.

Scope

Included

TypeScript correctness
public-surface drift
docs/test alignment
context-artifact maintenance triggers
package boundary and dependency-flow checks

Excluded

subjective style nitpicks without repository evidence
unrelated product strategy decisions

Inputs

diff-summary
touched-files
public-surface-change: yes/no
review-goal

Step-by-step Execution

Read the touched files and classify them by package and responsibility.
Check dependency direction: shared <- core <- mcp and shared <- core <- cli.
Look for strict-typing violations, missing tests, stale docs, or public-surface drift.
If CLI commands, MCP tools/resources, or supported clients changed, require docs/test updates in the same change.
If structure/config/dependency changes occurred, call out context-artifact updates as part of review.
Return findings ordered by risk: correctness, release/doc drift, maintainability.

Output Contract

Return:

blocking findings
non-blocking improvements
files/docs/tests that must be updated
exact verification commands

Verification Commands

pnpm run build
pnpm run release-status
pnpm run typecheck
pnpm run lint
pnpm run test

Evidence Format

finding severity
affected file(s)
why it matters in Agent Lint specifically
recommended fix
verification command(s)

Safety / DONTs

Do not suggest any, @ts-ignore, or band-aid casts.
Do not ignore docs consistency when public surface changes.
Do not add MCP-side file writes or stateful behavior.
Do not recommend skipping verification for package or client-facing changes.

Read the full file on GitHub · 102 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

5d ago First seen · 102 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 6303ec833891

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-quality-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository samilozturk/agentlint (30 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 677 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Code Quality & Review Code review

Apply Git branching, commit, and pull request best practices through Git Workflow Skill

Give an agent a portable Git workflow playbook for branch strategy, commit hygiene, pull requests, merge choices, and CI-aware collaboration.

agentskillexchange/skills · 43 tokens

Audit Python dependency declarations for unused, missing, and transitive imports before release

Use Deptry when an agent needs to verify that a Python project's declared dependencies still match the imports the code actually uses. The agent scans the codebase, flags unused direct dependencies, missing declarations, and transitive imports that only work by accident, then turns the findings into cleanup commits or…

agentskillexchange/skills · 76 tokens

code-quality-review