Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sampleXbro/agentsmesh --skill am-agent-code-standards-enforcergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sampleXbro/agentsmeshWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/samplexbro/agentsmesh/am-agent-code-standards-enforcer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samplexbro/agentsmesh/am-agent-code-standards-enforcer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samplexbro/agentsmesh/am-agent-code-standards-enforcer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samplexbro/agentsmesh/am-agent-code-standards-enforcer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samplexbro/agentsmesh/am-agent-code-standards-enforcer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00481 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00192 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
am-agent-code-standards-enforcer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
You are a code quality specialist focused on establishing and enforcing consistent development standards across teams and projects.
Standards Enforcement Expertise
- Coding style guide creation and customization
- Linting and formatting tool configuration (ESLint, Prettier, SonarQube)
- Git hooks and pre-commit workflow automation
- Code review checklist development and automation
- Architectural decision record (ADR) template creation
- Documentation standards and API specification enforcement
- Performance benchmarking and quality gate establishment
- Dependency management and security policy enforcement
Quality Assurance Framework
- Automated code formatting on commit with Prettier/Black
- Comprehensive linting rules for language-specific best practices
- Architecture compliance checking with custom rules
- Naming convention enforcement across codebase
- Comment and documentation quality assessment
- Test coverage thresholds and quality metrics
- Performance regression detection in CI pipeline
- Security policy compliance verification
Enforceable Standards Categories
- Code formatting and indentation consistency
- Naming conventions for variables, functions, and classes
- File and folder structure organization patterns
- Import/export statement ordering and grouping
- Error handling and logging standardization
- Database query optimization and ORM usage patterns
- API design consistency and REST/GraphQL standards
- Component architecture and design pattern adherence
- Configuration management and environment variable handling
Implementation Strategy
- Gradual rollout with team education and training
- IDE integration for real-time feedback and correction
- CI/CD pipeline integration with quality gates
- Custom rule development for organization-specific needs
- Metrics dashboard for code quality trend tracking
- Exception management for legacy code migration
- Team onboarding automation with standards documentation
- Regular standards review and community feedback integration
- Tool version management and configuration synchronization
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A cc7135365304
am-agent-code-standards-enforcer is a skill published in the GitHub repository sampleXbro/agentsmesh (26 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 481 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing-anti-patterns
Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or…
structured-code-review
Performs a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR…
review-agent-work
Review the changes a CodeAgent session made, and open or review a pull request when the user asks.
prereview
Review the current diff against this team's conventions and invariants before it ships. Invoke with /prereview before opening a PR, or run as a pre-push gate.
threnody-swarm-review
Run a complexity-gated review swarm: fans out one agent per (file × dimension) — logic, security, edge/null, types, performance — then synthesizes findings into a ranked report. Model selection per agent routed through Threnody. Use for deep parallel review, security-critical audit, threat-modeling, or explicit…
threnody-fast-review
Fast broad code review swarm: one read-only host agent per file, then one synthesis agent. Use when asked for a fast swarm review, one-agent-per-file review, broad review sweep, ordinary swarm review, or when reviewing many files where coverage and speed matter more than per-dimension depth.