Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sampleXbro/agentsmesh --skill am-command-ponytail-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sampleXbro/agentsmeshWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/samplexbro/agentsmesh/am-command-ponytail-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samplexbro/agentsmesh/am-command-ponytail-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samplexbro/agentsmesh/am-command-ponytail-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samplexbro/agentsmesh/am-command-ponytail-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samplexbro/agentsmesh/am-command-ponytail-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00159 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
am-command-ponytail-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Audit the entire repository for over-engineering only, not correctness. Scan the whole tree, not a diff. One line per finding, ranked biggest cut first: . . [path]. Tags: delete (dead code/speculative feature), stdlib (reinvented standard library), native (dependency doing what the platform does), yagni (abstraction with one implementation), shrink (same logic, fewer lines). End with the net lines and dependencies removable. If nothing to cut: 'Lean already. Ship.'
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 8 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 15e561dc659b
am-command-ponytail-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository sampleXbro/agentsmesh (25 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 159 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-19.
Other skills, from other repositories
Agent Browser Automation
Fast Rust-based headless browser automation CLI with Node.js fallback for AI agents, featuring navigation, clicking, typing, snapshots, and structured commands optimized for agent workflows.
next-action
Use when the user wants a next-action recommendation based on current state — reads handoff/git/lessons/STATE and proposes top-3 by impact. Trigger: '/next', 'what should I do next', 'next action'. Proposes only, never executes.
structured-code-review
Performs a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR…
implement-specs
Implement one or more checked-in specs using scout-plan-implement-verify workflow.
replay
Find, analyze, and share AI coding sessions with vibe-replay. Use when the user asks for a replay, wants to find a past session, run a session retro, share Cursor/Claude/Codex session context, or attach session context to a PR.
pull-request-automation
Audits and improves the pull request workflow for a GitHub repository. Covers PR description templates, auto-labelling, CODEOWNERS, PR size checks, and branch protection rules. Invoked when the user asks to improve the PR process, set up PR automation, or add a PR template.