alice-open-loop-review

alice-open-loop-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from samrusani/AliceMemory. It costs 21 tokens per session (349 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review procedure for unresolved commitments, also called open loops, using Alice project-tracking tools. It groups items by whether someone is waiting, blocked, or needs a next action.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review what remains open, find blockers, and produce a prioritized list of concrete next steps.
Why use it?
It makes unfinished work easier to assess and helps identify urgent or overdue items before lower-priority follow-ups.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review what remains open, find blockers, and produce a prioritized list of concrete next steps.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/samrusani/alicememory/alice-open-loop-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add samrusani/AliceMemory --skill alice-open-loop-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samrusani/AliceMemory

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for alice-open-loop-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samrusani/alicememory/alice-open-loop-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/samrusani/alicememory/alice-open-loop-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samrusani/alicememory/alice-open-loop-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samrusani/alicememory/alice-open-loop-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for alice-open-loop-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samrusani/alicememory/alice-open-loop-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samrusani/alicememory/alice-open-loop-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 21 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 349 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00021 $0.00349
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00175
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00070
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00035

Measured 12d ago against content hash 17268e969a18, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

alice-open-loop-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

docs/integrations/hermes-skill-pack/skills/alice-workflows/alice-open-loop-review/SKILL.md · 56 lines

What it actually says

Alice Open-Loop Review

Goal

Turn open loops into a prioritized action queue grounded in Alice continuity state.

Trigger Cues

Use this skill when the user asks:

  • what is still open
  • what is blocked or waiting
  • what should I do next from unresolved items

Required MCP Tools

  • mcp_<alice_server>_alice_open_loops
  • Optional: mcp_<alice_server>_alice_recent_changes (keyless-local legacy tool; unavailable when the Alice MCP server is bound with ALICE_AGENT_API_KEY)

<alice_server> is usually alice_core.

Workflow

  1. Call alice_open_loops for the relevant scope.
  2. Keep output grouped by posture:
    • waiting_for
    • blocker
    • stale
    • next_action
  3. Surface top priorities first (blocked and overdue items before low-risk follow-ups).
  4. Convert each group into explicit next steps.

Tool Call Template

mcp_alice_core_alice_open_loops({"thread_id":"<uuid>","limit":10})

Output Contract

Always include:

  • grouped open-loop summary
  • top 3 priority actions
  • per-item rationale tied to returned loop posture
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 56 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 17268e969a18

Subscribe to this mod's changes

alice-open-loop-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository samrusani/AliceMemory (3 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 349 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.