Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add san-npm/skills-ws --skill business-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/san-npm/skills-wsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/san-npm/skills-ws/business-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/san-npm/skills-ws/business-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/san-npm/skills-ws/business-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/san-npm/skills-ws/business-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/san-npm/skills-ws/business-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.05036 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.02518 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01007 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00504 |
Grade A, and why
business-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 298 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Business Development
Workflow
1. Partner Identification
Scoring matrix — rate each potential partner 1-5:
| Criterion | Weight | Score (1-5) |
|---|---|---|
| Audience overlap | 25% | Does their audience need your product? |
| Technical fit | 20% | Can you integrate/co-build? |
| Brand alignment | 15% | Compatible positioning and values? |
| Reach | 15% | Audience size and engagement |
| Strategic value | 15% | Opens new market/segment? |
| Effort to close | 10% | Decision-maker accessibility |
Weighted score > 3.5 = pursue. 2.5-3.5 = nurture. < 2.5 = skip.
2. Outreach Sequences
Compliance-first outbound — read before sending anything. B2B cold email is not exempt from the law. Get these right or you risk fines, domain blacklisting, and platform bans. None of this is legal advice — confirm with counsel for your jurisdictions and verify current rules at the official sources below.
Lawful basis & consent (by region):
| Region | Cold email to a business contact | Source of truth |
|---|---|---|
| US (CAN-SPAM) | Allowed without prior consent, but requires accurate From/Subject, a physical postal address, and a working opt-out honored within 10 business days. |
ftc.gov — CAN-SPAM compliance guide |
| EU/EEA (GDPR + ePrivacy) | Email to a named individual needs a lawful basis. Legitimate interest can work for B2B prospecting if the offer is relevant to their role and you pass a balancing test + provide easy opt-out; some member states (e.g. DE, IT) effectively require opt-in. Generic role aliases (info@, sales@) are lower-risk. |
gdpr.eu / your national DPA; verify per-country as of Jun 2026 |
| UK (UK GDPR + PECR) | Similar to EU; the "soft opt-in" and corporate-subscriber rules under PECR apply. | ico.org.uk |
| California (CCPA/CPRA) | Not a spam law per se, but honor opt-out/"Do Not Sell or Share" and disclose data use; CPRA expanded this. | oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa |
| Canada (CASL) | One of the strictest: generally requires express or implied consent before commercial email. | ised-isde.canada.ca, Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation page (fightspam.gc.ca redirects there) |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 298 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A d9df61730bc2
business-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository san-npm/skills-ws (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 5,036 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…