Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add san-npm/skills-ws --skill eu-legal-compliancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/san-npm/skills-wsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/san-npm/skills-ws/eu-legal-compliance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/san-npm/skills-ws/eu-legal-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/san-npm/skills-ws/eu-legal-compliance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/san-npm/skills-ws/eu-legal-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/san-npm/skills-ws/eu-legal-compliance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.08642 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.04321 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01728 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00864 |
Grade A, and why
eu-legal-compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 314 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
EU Legal Compliance
Scope & disclaimer. This skill is an engineering/product-oriented reference for EU-level law as of June 2026. It is not legal advice and does not replace a qualified EU data-protection lawyer or your DPO. EU regulations apply directly, but directives (NIS2, EAA, ePrivacy, consumer directives) are transposed into national law that varies by member state — always check the local implementing act and the lead/competent authority for your establishment. Engage counsel for: high-risk processing, cross-border transfers, breach notifications, AI Act high-risk/GPAI classification, M&A/data deals, regulator inquiries, and any consumer-facing contract terms.
Controller vs processor. Most obligations below differ by role. A controller decides the purposes and means of processing (Art. 4(7)); a processor acts only on documented controller instructions (Art. 4(8)). Joint controllers (Art. 26) need an arrangement allocating responsibilities. Identify your role per processing activity before applying any checklist — it changes who answers DSARs, who notifies breaches, and who signs which contract (controller↔processor needs an Art. 28 DPA).
GDPR (Regulation 2016/679)
Lawful Bases (Art. 6)
| Basis | Use Case | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Consent (Art. 6(1)(a)) | Marketing emails, cookies | Must be freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous. Withdrawable. |
| Contract (Art. 6(1)(b)) | Service delivery, billing | Only data strictly necessary for the contract |
| Legal obligation (Art. 6(1)(c)) | Tax records, AML | Must identify the specific law |
| Vital interests (Art. 6(1)(d)) | Medical emergency | Rarely applicable for tech companies |
| Public interest (Art. 6(1)(e)) | Government services | Requires legal basis in member state law |
| Legitimate interest (Art. 6(1)(f)) | Analytics, fraud prevention, B2B marketing | Requires LIA (balancing test). Document it. |
Data Subject Rights Implementation
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 314 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 4b82044939bd
eu-legal-compliance is a skill published in the GitHub repository san-npm/skills-ws (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 8,642 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…